Raguth v. Astrue
ORDER TO ANSWER. Defendants to either file answer within thirty (30) days or show cause why default should not be entered in this case. Signed by Judge Vadas on 3/29/11. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)
Raguth v. Astrue
1 2 3 4 5 6 SHIRLEY ANN RAGUTH, 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 10 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER No. C-10-03863 NJV UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 This is a complaint for judicial review of decision of a commissioner of social security. The 14 complaint was filed in this court on August 30, 2010. While it is unclear from the docket when 15 Defendant was served with the summons and complaint, Defendant filed a consent to proceed before 16 a Magistrate Judge on October 20, 2010. Pursuant to the Procedural Order for Social Security 17 Review Actions, filed in this case on August 30, 2010, Defendant must file an serve an answer 18 within ninety days of receipt of service of the summons and complaint. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall either file an answer in this 20 case within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, or show cause why default should not 21 be entered in this case. 22 23 24 Dated: March 29, 2011 25 26 27 28 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?