Stewart et al v. Morris et al
Filing
42
ORDER re 41 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Trial and Pre-Trial Ddlines filed by Seth Cimino, Joe Garcia, Gene McManus, Mike Riese, Steve Morris, County of Del Norte Dispositive Motions due by 6/21/2013. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/5/2013 02:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 12/2/2013 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 2/5/13. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)
1
3
Karen D. Olson, CSB #207995
431 H Street, Suite A
Crescent City, CA 95531
Tel: 707-464-2350
Fax: 707-464-7845
4
Attorney for Plaintiffs
5
John M. Vrieze, CSB #115397
William F. Mitchell, CSB #159831
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
Attorneys at Law
814 Seventh Street
P. O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
Tel: (707) 443-5643
Fax: (707) 444-9586
2
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
EUREKA DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
KIRK STEWART, SUSAN STEWART,
CAMERON STEWART AND FRED
OTREMBA,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
)
)
)
)
)
)
STEVE MORRIS, SETH CIMINO, JOE )
GARCIA, GENE MCMANUS, MIKE
)
RIESE, COUNTY OF DEL NORTE AND )
DOES 1-5
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: CV 10-4106 NJV
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND
PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY
DEADLINES
23
24
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
0
________________________________________________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL
AND PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY DEADLINES
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Plaintiffs KIRK
2
STEWART, SUSAN STEWART, CAMERON STEWART and FRED OTREMBA, and
3
Defendants STEVE MORRIS, SETH CIMINO, JOE GARCIA, GENE MCMANUS,
4
MIKE RIESE and COUNTY OF DEL NORTE, through their respective attorneys of
5
record, as follows:
6
This case is currently scheduled for trial on August 20, 2013. The parties hereby
7
stipulate to continue the trial until December 2, 2013, or to a date convenient for the
8
Court. In addition to stipulating to continuing the trial, the parties propose the following
9
schedule:
10
Disclosure of Experts:
Completed
11
Expert Discovery Cutoff:
May 24, 2013
12
Dispositive Motion Filing Cutoff
June 21, 2013
13
Final Pretrial Conference
November 5, 2013
14
Trial
December 2, 2013
15
Based upon the foregoing Joint Stipulation, the parties request the following: (a)
16
that the trial be moved from August 20, 2013, to December 2, 2013, or a date convenient
17
for the Court; and (b) an extension to pre-trial discovery deadlines as proposed above.
18
19
DATED: February 5, 2013
20
LAW OFFICE OF KAREN OLSON
/s/ Karen Olson
By: ______________________________________
Karen Olson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
DATED: February 5, 2013
MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE, LLP
24
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
/s/ John M. Vrieze
By: ______________________________________
John M. Vrieze
Attorney for Defendants
1
________________________________________________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL
AND PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY DEADLINES
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Based upon the Joint Stipulation of all parties, the trial is continued to December
3
2, 2013, the Expert Discovery Cutoff is May 24, 2013, the Dispositive Motion Filing
4
Cutoff is June 21, 2013, and the Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for November 5,
5
2013, at 2:30 p.m.
6
7
8
DATED: February 5, 2013
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MITCHELL, BRISSO,
DELANEY & VRIEZE
814 Seventh Street
P.O. Drawer 1008
Eureka, CA 95502
2
________________________________________________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL
AND PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?