Stewart et al v. Morris et al

Filing 67

ORDER striking Separate Statements of Undisputed Facts; re 61 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Fred Otremba, Kirk Stewart, Susan Stewart, Cameron Stewart, 45 Statement filed by Seth Cimino, Gene McManus, Mike Riese, Steve Morris, County of Del Norte, 64 Reply to Opposition/Response, filed by Seth Cimino, Gene McManus, Mike Riese, Steve Morris, County of Del Norte. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on July 24, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 KIRK STEWART, et al., Case No. 10-cv-04106-NJV Plaintiffs, 9 v. ORDER STRIKING DOCS. NO. 45, 61, AND 64 10 11 STEVE MORRIS, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 14 The parties have submitted three statements of undisputed facts. See Doc. Nos. 45, 61, and 15 64. Separate statements of undisputed facts in support of or in opposition to motions for summary 16 judgment shall NOT be filed unless otherwise ordered by the court. See Civil Case Management 17 and Pretrial Order at 2:25-28; see also N.D. Civil L. R. 56-2. The court has not requested separate 18 statements of undisputed facts. Pursuant to this court’s Civil Case Management and Pretrial Order 19 and the Northern District Local Rules, Docs. No. 45, 61, and 64 are stricken. If the parties agree 20 that certain material facts are undisputed, they may submit a joint statement of undisputed facts no 21 later than July 31, 2013. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2013 ______________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?