Stewart et al v. Morris et al
Filing
67
ORDER striking Separate Statements of Undisputed Facts; re 61 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by Fred Otremba, Kirk Stewart, Susan Stewart, Cameron Stewart, 45 Statement filed by Seth Cimino, Gene McManus, Mike Riese, Steve Morris, County of Del Norte, 64 Reply to Opposition/Response, filed by Seth Cimino, Gene McManus, Mike Riese, Steve Morris, County of Del Norte. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on July 24, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISION
7
8
KIRK STEWART, et al.,
Case No. 10-cv-04106-NJV
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
ORDER STRIKING DOCS. NO. 45, 61,
AND 64
10
11
STEVE MORRIS, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
The parties have submitted three statements of undisputed facts. See Doc. Nos. 45, 61, and
15
64. Separate statements of undisputed facts in support of or in opposition to motions for summary
16
judgment shall NOT be filed unless otherwise ordered by the court. See Civil Case Management
17
and Pretrial Order at 2:25-28; see also N.D. Civil L. R. 56-2. The court has not requested separate
18
statements of undisputed facts. Pursuant to this court’s Civil Case Management and Pretrial Order
19
and the Northern District Local Rules, Docs. No. 45, 61, and 64 are stricken. If the parties agree
20
that certain material facts are undisputed, they may submit a joint statement of undisputed facts no
21
later than July 31, 2013.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 24, 2013
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?