Riese v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
ORDER re Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on November 28, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL D. RIESE,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 11-03297 NJV
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, et al.,
Plaintiff Michael Riese filed a motion to compel, which is scheduled to be heard on
December 11, 2012. See Doc. Nos. 50, 53. In its opposition to the motion, Defendant JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A. represents that it has supplemented its responses to the document requests and
requests for admission at issue, and that Plaintiff has deemed the supplemental responses sufficient.
Doc. No. 52 (attaching Plaintiff’s November 7, 2012 email). Defendant contends the motion is
moot. Plaintiff has failed to file a reply contradicting Defendant’s representation that the discovery
dispute is moot; but he also has failed to withdraw the motion. To avoid the waste of judicial
resources on this matter, the court orders Plaintiff on or before December 4, 2012, either to (1)
withdraw his motion to compel or (2) file a reply identifying any pending issues.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 28, 2012
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?