Trevillion v. Dillon et al
Filing
6
ORDER returning letter to Plaintiff. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
KIM Y. TREVILLION,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
No. 11-CV-4099 NJV
ORDER RETURNING LETTER TO
PLAINTIFF
v.
12
HARRY E. DILLION, et al.,
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
The Court is in receipt of a letter from Plaintiff dated September 8, 2011. Plaintiff is hereby
16
informed that litigation in this Court proceeds in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
17
Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of
18
California. Relief cannot be sought in this Court through a letter. Accordingly, the Court hereby
19
returns Plaintiff's letter to her.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: September 12, 2011
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EUREKA DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
KIM Y. TREVILLION,
13
Plaintiff,
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
15
No. 11-CV-4099 NJV
HARRY E. DILLON, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on September 12, 2011, I served a true and correct
19
copy of the attached by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person listed
20
below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
21
22
23
24
25
Kim Y. Trevillion
2031 F Street
Apt. 1
Eureka, CA 95501-3773
26
27
28
Dated: September 12, 2011
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to the
Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?