Adams v. Astrue
ORDER requiring further briefing. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RANSOM KENNETH ADAMS,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. 1:11-CV-6646 NJV
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
The parties shall simultaneously brief the following issues: 1) the Administrative Law
Judge’s (“ALJ”) duty to discuss in his decision all evidence he has relied on in reaching that
decision; 2) the duty of the reviewing court on appeal when it finds that the ALR has not discussed
relevant evidence in his decision; and 3) the duty of the reviewing court on appeal when it finds that
the ALJ’s decision does not accurately describe the evidence in the record. The parties are shall
make every effort to cite controlling authority. The parties shall file letter briefs on this issue, not
exceeding five pages of single-spaced type, no later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday, February 15, 2013.
No extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
Dated: February 4, 2013
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?