Adams v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER requiring further briefing. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

EUREKA DIVISION

8
9

RANSOM KENNETH ADAMS,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

No. 1:11-CV-6646 NJV
ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER
BRIEFING

v.

12

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

13

Defendant.
___________________________________/

14
15

The parties shall simultaneously brief the following issues: 1) the Administrative Law

16

Judge’s (“ALJ”) duty to discuss in his decision all evidence he has relied on in reaching that

17

decision; 2) the duty of the reviewing court on appeal when it finds that the ALR has not discussed

18

relevant evidence in his decision; and 3) the duty of the reviewing court on appeal when it finds that

19

the ALJ’s decision does not accurately describe the evidence in the record. The parties are shall

20

make every effort to cite controlling authority. The parties shall file letter briefs on this issue, not

21

exceeding five pages of single-spaced type, no later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday, February 15, 2013.

22

No extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

23

Dated: February 4, 2013

24
25
26
27
28

NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge