Adams v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER requiring further briefing. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 RANSOM KENNETH ADAMS, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, No. 1:11-CV-6646 NJV ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING v. 12 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 13 Defendant. ___________________________________/ 14 15 The parties shall simultaneously brief the following issues: 1) the Administrative Law 16 Judge’s (“ALJ”) duty to discuss in his decision all evidence he has relied on in reaching that 17 decision; 2) the duty of the reviewing court on appeal when it finds that the ALR has not discussed 18 relevant evidence in his decision; and 3) the duty of the reviewing court on appeal when it finds that 19 the ALJ’s decision does not accurately describe the evidence in the record. The parties are shall 20 make every effort to cite controlling authority. The parties shall file letter briefs on this issue, not 21 exceeding five pages of single-spaced type, no later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday, February 15, 2013. 22 No extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. 23 Dated: February 4, 2013 24 25 26 27 28 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?