Wofford et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on March 11, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)
1 THERESE Y. CANNATA (SBN 88032)
MICHAEL M. CHING (SBN 209426)
2 CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP
100 Pine Street, Suite 350
3 San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 409-8900
4 Facsimile: (415) 409-8904
5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DANA WOFFORD, GAIL WOFFORD
6 and MARK BENNETT
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
EUREKA DIVISION
T EL: ( 4 1 5 ) 4 0 9 - 8 90 0 P F AX: ( 4 1 5) 4 0 9 -8 9 0 4
A T T O RNE Y S A T L A W
100 Pine Street, Suite 350
San Francisc o, CA 94111
CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP
10
11 DANA WOFFORD, an individual, GAIL
WOFFORD, an individual, and MARK
12 BENNETT, an individual,
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION
_____________________________________/
FRCP 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii)
Plaintiffs,
13
14
CASE NO. C 12-04167 NJV
v.
& ORDER
15 BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, and
16 DOES 1-20, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
___________________________________/
18
19
20
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2012, plaintiffs Dana Wofford, Gail Wofford and Mark Bennett
21 (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against defendant BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING,
22 LLC, (“defendant”)for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation/deceit, fraud, unfair
23 business practices, and injunctive relief;
24
WHEREAS, on or about February 22, 2013, plaintiffs and defendants settled this matter;
25
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by an between plaintiffs and defendants
26 through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with
27 prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)1)(A)(ii).
28
-1-
720852..pldg.stipiulation for dismissal.3.6.13.mmc.wpd
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL – N.D. Cal.CASE NO. C 12-04167 NJV
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
2
3 Dated: March 6, 2013
CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP
4
/s/ Michael M. Ching
___________________________________
MICHAEL M. CHING
Attorneys for plaintiffs DANA WOFFORD,
GAIL WOFFORD, and MARK BENNETT
5
6
7
8 Dated: March 6, 2013
EDWARD G. SCHLOSS LAW CORPORATION
9
/s/ Edward G. Schloss
___________________________________
EDWARD G. SCHLOSS
Attorneys for defendant BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING,
LLC
11
12
13
Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule, Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under
14 penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its
15 signatory.
16
17 Dated: March 6, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
18
/s/ Michael M. Ching
___________________________________
Michael M. Ching
19
20
21
ER
R NIA
Vadas
FO
Judge N
H
27
RT
26
andor J.
NO
25
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 11, 2013
A
22
UNIT
ED
T EL: ( 4 1 5 ) 4 0 9 - 8 90 0 P F AX: ( 4 1 5) 4 0 9 -8 9 0 4
A T T O RNE Y S A T L A W
100 Pine Street, Suite 350
San Francisc o, CA 94111
CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
28
-2-
720852..pldg.stipiulation for dismissal.3.6.13.mmc.wpd
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL – N.D. Cal.CASE NO. C 12-04167 NJV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?