Wofford et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER, ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on March 11, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 THERESE Y. CANNATA (SBN 88032) MICHAEL M. CHING (SBN 209426) 2 CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 409-8900 4 Facsimile: (415) 409-8904 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANA WOFFORD, GAIL WOFFORD 6 and MARK BENNETT 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EUREKA DIVISION T EL: ( 4 1 5 ) 4 0 9 - 8 90 0 P F AX: ( 4 1 5) 4 0 9 -8 9 0 4 A T T O RNE Y S A T L A W 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisc o, CA 94111 CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP 10 11 DANA WOFFORD, an individual, GAIL WOFFORD, an individual, and MARK 12 BENNETT, an individual, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION _____________________________________/ FRCP 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiffs, 13 14 CASE NO. C 12-04167 NJV v. & ORDER 15 BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and 16 DOES 1-20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 18 19 20 WHEREAS, on August 8, 2012, plaintiffs Dana Wofford, Gail Wofford and Mark Bennett 21 (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against defendant BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, 22 LLC, (“defendant”)for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation/deceit, fraud, unfair 23 business practices, and injunctive relief; 24 WHEREAS, on or about February 22, 2013, plaintiffs and defendants settled this matter; 25 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by an between plaintiffs and defendants 26 through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with 27 prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)1)(A)(ii). 28 -1- 720852..pldg.stipiulation for dismissal.3.6.13.mmc.wpd STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL – N.D. Cal.CASE NO. C 12-04167 NJV 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 2 3 Dated: March 6, 2013 CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP 4 /s/ Michael M. Ching ___________________________________ MICHAEL M. CHING Attorneys for plaintiffs DANA WOFFORD, GAIL WOFFORD, and MARK BENNETT 5 6 7 8 Dated: March 6, 2013 EDWARD G. SCHLOSS LAW CORPORATION 9 /s/ Edward G. Schloss ___________________________________ EDWARD G. SCHLOSS Attorneys for defendant BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC 11 12 13 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule, Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under 14 penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its 15 signatory. 16 17 Dated: March 6, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 18 /s/ Michael M. Ching ___________________________________ Michael M. Ching 19 20 21 ER R NIA Vadas FO Judge N H 27 RT 26 andor J. NO 25 ERED O ORD IT IS S LI 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. March 11, 2013 A 22 UNIT ED T EL: ( 4 1 5 ) 4 0 9 - 8 90 0 P F AX: ( 4 1 5) 4 0 9 -8 9 0 4 A T T O RNE Y S A T L A W 100 Pine Street, Suite 350 San Francisc o, CA 94111 CANNATA, CHING & O’TOOLE LLP 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 -2- 720852..pldg.stipiulation for dismissal.3.6.13.mmc.wpd STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL – N.D. Cal.CASE NO. C 12-04167 NJV

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?