Brooktrails Township Community Services District v. United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER extending time to respond to complaint and continuing case management conference filed by United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Case Management Statement due by 2/19/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/26/2013 02:00 PM.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on December 19, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348) Chief, Civil Division CLAIRE T. CORMIER (CSBN 154364) Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5082 FAX: (408) 535-5081 claire.cormier@usdoj.gov Specially appearing for Federal Defendants 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 EUREKA DIVISION 12 13 BROOKTRAILS TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, a public agency, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT; JOSEPH SHUNK, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C12-5576 NJV STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 19 20 The parties previously stipulated that the defendants would have an extension of time 21 December 31, 2012 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint for Injunctive Relief 22 (“Complaint”) in this action if certain partial production of documents was done. That 23 production was done, and defendant USDA has committed to a further rolling production with 24 the plan of completing the response and production relating to plaintiff’s Freedom of Information 25 Act request by January 18, 2013. The parties are hopeful that this rolling production may lead to 26 the dismissal of this action. 27 In order to allow for the completion of the production and plaintiff’s review of the 28 documents and any claimed exemptions, the parties wish to further extend the deadline for 1 defendants’ response to the Complaint, as well as the initial case management conference, 2 currently scheduled for January 29, 2013. 3 Accordingly, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties to this action hereby 4 stipulate and request that the defendants shall have an extension of time to January 31, 2013 to 5 answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 6 The parties further stipulate and request that the initial case management conference, 7 currently scheduled to take place on January 29, 2013, be continued to February 26, 2013, and 8 that the related case management dates be continued accordingly. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, 10 11 DATED: December 17, 2012 NEARY and O’BRIEN 12 /s/ Christopher J. Neary 13 CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY Attorney for Plaintiffs 14 15 DATED: December 18, 2012 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 16 /s/ Claire T. Cormier 17 CLAIRE T. CORMIER1 Assistant United States Attorney 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the deadline for 21 defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended to 22 23 January 31, 2013. The initial case management conference is continued to February 26, 2013, DISTRI S TE TA CT C FO A H ER LI RT 27 28 _______________________________________ das or J. Va NANDOR JudgVADAS J. e Nand United States Magistrate Judge NO 19 DATE: December ___, 2012 26 D RDERE R NIA S UNIT ED 25 OO IT IS S RT U O and other case management deadlines are extended accordingly. 24 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 I, Claire T. Cormier, hereby attest that Mr. Neary authorized me to electronically sign this document on his behalf. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER AND CMC CONTINUANCE Case No. C12-5576 NJV 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?