Brooktrails Township Community Services District v. United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER extending time to respond to complaint and continuing case management conference filed by United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Case Management Statement due by 2/19/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/26/2013 02:00 PM.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on December 19, 2012. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
CLAIRE T. CORMIER (CSBN 154364)
Assistant United States Attorney
150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 535-5082
FAX: (408) 535-5081
claire.cormier@usdoj.gov
Specially appearing for
Federal Defendants
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
EUREKA DIVISION
12
13
BROOKTRAILS TOWNSHIP
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, a
public agency,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE, RURAL
DEVELOPMENT; JOSEPH SHUNK,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C12-5576 NJV
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
19
20
The parties previously stipulated that the defendants would have an extension of time
21
December 31, 2012 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint for Injunctive Relief
22
(“Complaint”) in this action if certain partial production of documents was done. That
23
production was done, and defendant USDA has committed to a further rolling production with
24
the plan of completing the response and production relating to plaintiff’s Freedom of Information
25
Act request by January 18, 2013. The parties are hopeful that this rolling production may lead to
26
the dismissal of this action.
27
In order to allow for the completion of the production and plaintiff’s review of the
28
documents and any claimed exemptions, the parties wish to further extend the deadline for
1
defendants’ response to the Complaint, as well as the initial case management conference,
2
currently scheduled for January 29, 2013.
3
Accordingly, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties to this action hereby
4
stipulate and request that the defendants shall have an extension of time to January 31, 2013 to
5
answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
6
The parties further stipulate and request that the initial case management conference,
7
currently scheduled to take place on January 29, 2013, be continued to February 26, 2013, and
8
that the related case management dates be continued accordingly.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,
10
11
DATED: December 17, 2012
NEARY and O’BRIEN
12
/s/ Christopher J. Neary
13
CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY
Attorney for Plaintiffs
14
15
DATED: December 18, 2012
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
16
/s/ Claire T. Cormier
17
CLAIRE T. CORMIER1
Assistant United States Attorney
18
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the deadline for
21
defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended to
22
23
January 31, 2013. The initial case management conference is continued to February 26, 2013,
DISTRI
S
TE
TA
CT
C
FO
A
H
ER
LI
RT
27
28
_______________________________________
das
or J. Va
NANDOR JudgVADAS
J. e Nand
United States Magistrate Judge
NO
19
DATE: December ___, 2012
26
D
RDERE
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
25
OO
IT IS S
RT
U
O
and other case management deadlines are extended accordingly.
24
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
I, Claire T. Cormier, hereby attest that Mr. Neary authorized me to electronically sign
this document on his behalf.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER AND CMC CONTINUANCE
Case No. C12-5576 NJV
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?