Mahrt v. Beard et al
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 8/18/2014.Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 6/17/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
EUREKA DIVISION
6
7
GREGORY MAHRT,
Petitioner,
8
vs.
9
ORDER FOR RESPONDENT
TO SHOW CAUSE
JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al.,
Respondent.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. 1:14-CV-1696 NJV
/
12
13
Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant
14
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner was convicted in Sonoma County, which is in this district,
15
so venue is proper here. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitioner been granted leave to
16
proceed in forma pauperis and has consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge.
17
Docket Nos. 7 and 8.
18
BACKGROUND
19
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Petitioner was convicted of being a felon in
20
possession of a firearm in violation of Penal Code Section 29800(a)(1), and of being in
21
possession of ammunition in violation of Penal code Section 30305(a)(1).
22
Petitioner states that he appealed to the Court of Appeal and filed a petition for writ of
23
habeas corpus with the California Supreme Court, both of which were denied.
DISCUSSION
24
25
26
A.
Standard of Review
This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus "in behalf of a person in
27
custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody
28
in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. §
1
2254(a); Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). Habeas corpus petitions must meet
2
heightened pleading requirements. McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994). An
3
application for a federal writ of habeas corpus filed by a prisoner who is in state custody
4
pursuant to a judgment of a state court must “specify all the grounds for relief available to
5
the petitioner ... [and] state the facts supporting each ground.” Rule 2(c) of the Rules
6
Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. “‘[N]otice’ pleading is not sufficient, for the
7
petition is expected to state facts that point to a ‘real possibility of constitutional error.’”
8
Rule 4 Advisory Committee Notes (quoting Aubut v. Maine, 431 F.2d 688, 689 (1st Cir.
9
1970)).
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
B.
Legal Claims
Petitioner’s ground for federal habeas relief is that he was denied his Sixth
12
Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and was thereby prejudiced. This claim
13
is sufficient to require a response.
14
CONCLUSION
15
1. The clerk shall serve by regular mail a copy of this order, the petition and all
16
attachments thereto and a Magistrate Judge jurisdiction consent form on respondent and
17
respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The clerk also shall
18
serve a copy of this order on petitioner.
19
2. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within fifty-six (56)
20
days of the issuance of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the
21
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should
22
not be granted. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on petitioner a copy of all
23
portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant
24
to a determination of the issues presented by the petition.
25
If petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with
26
the court and serving it on respondent within twenty-eight (28) days of his receipt of the
27
answer.
28
3. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an
2
1
answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing
2
Section 2254 Cases. If respondent files such a motion, it is due fifty-six (56) days from the
3
date this order is entered. If a motion is filed, petitioner shall file with the court and serve
4
on respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-eight (28) days of
5
receipt of the motion, and respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner a reply
6
within fourteen (14) days of receipt of any opposition.
7
4. Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the court must be served on
8
respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to respondent’s counsel. Petitioner
9
must keep the court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court's
orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Martinez v.
12
Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997) (Rule 41(b) applicable in habeas cases).
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated: June 17, 2014.
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?