Mendez v. California Forensic Medical Group, Inc.
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Hearing set for 9/22/2015 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 8/25/2015. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISION
7
8
INES MENDEZ,
Case No. 14-cv-03756-NJV
Plaintiff,
9
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
This matter came on for hearing on August 25, 2015. The purpose of the hearing was to
15
inform Plaintiff that he was no longer represented in this case as his counsel was no longer an
16
active member of the State bar of California and was suspended from this court’s bar. The court
17
planned to inquire of Plaintiff whether he intended to procure new counsel or proceed pro se. To
18
that end, the court ordered Plaintiff to appear in person for the August 25, 2015 hearing and served
19
copies of that order on Plaintiff at his two last known addresses. Plaintiff did not appear for the
20
hearing. Several minutes after the hearing began, Mr. Davies, the aforementioned suspended
21
attorney, appeared and with paperwork in hand explained that he had, just that very morning, been
22
reinstated to the State Bar of California and that he had spoken with Plaintiff about the hearing.
23
However, Mr. Davies was unable to account for Plaintiff’s failure to appear. The court instructed
24
Mr. Davies that he would need to reapply for active status with the bar of this court before he
25
could proceed as counsel in this case.
26
The court has now, on two occasions, ordered Plaintiff to attend hearings and Plaintiff has
27
now, on two occasions, ignored the orders of this court. Considering the lack of any timely
28
response to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, counsel’s apparent indifference to his
1
bar status, and Plaintiff’s blatant disregard of this court’s orders to appear, it is ORDERED that
2
Plaintiff INES MENDEZ shall appear at the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 3140
3
Boeing Avenue, McKinleyville, CA 95519 at 10:00 a.m. on September 22, 2015 and show cause
4
as to why this case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure
5
to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of the court.
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Plaintiff is warned that his failure to appear at the hearing will result in the court
dismissing this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 25, 2015
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
EUREKA DIVISION
4
5
INES MENDEZ,
Case No. 14-cv-03756-NJV
Plaintiff,
6
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on August 25, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
INES MENDES
4014 Little Fairfield
Eureka, CA 95501
18
19
INES MENDES
2101 Spring Street
Eureka, CA 95501
20
22
Stephen Turner Davies
Turner Litigation Services
P.O. Box 319
Eureka, CA 95502
23
Dated: August 25, 2015
21
24
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
25
26
27
28
By:________________________
Robert Illman, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable NANDOR J. VADAS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?