M.S. v. County of Lake et al

Filing 28

ORDER Case Management Conference continued to 6/30/2015 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Nandor Vadas on 5/14/2015. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 Michael D. Green SBN 214142 Scott R. Montgomery SBN 278060 ABBEY, WEITZENBERG, WARREN & EMERY, P.C. 100 Stony Point Road, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1566 Santa Rosa, CA 95402 Tel: (707) 542 – 5050 Fax: (707) 542 – 2589 Attorneys for Plaintiffs A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2 3 4 John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 5 Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF LAKE 6 11 Jerome M. Varanini SBN 58531 LAW OFFICES OF JEROME M. VARANINI 641 Fulton Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 P.O. Box 590 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sacramento, CA 95812-0590 Tel: (916) 993-4868 Attorney for Defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D., STANCIL JOHNSON, M.D., ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY, and MANDY ROBBINS 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 9 10 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 M.S., a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, JEFFERY SMITH, both individually and in her capacity as successor-in-interest to JAMES SMITH, deceased; JEFFERY SMITH; and ELIZABETH SMITH Case No.: 1:14-CV-05170-NJV STIPULATION TO MANAGEMENT XXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, 19 CONTINUE CASE CONFERENCE; Date: May 26, 2015 Time: 2:00 p.m. 20 vs. 21 COUNTY OF LAKE; COUNTY OF LAKE SHERIFF FRANCISCO RIVERO; COUNTY OF LAKE DEPUTY SHERIFF WEAVER; COUNTY OF LAKE DEPUTY SHERIFF RODELLO; COUNTY OF LAKE DEPUTY SHERIFF VANOVEN; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP; TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D.; STANCIL JOHNSON, M.D.; ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY; MALADY ROBERTS; and DOES 1-50; 22 23 24 25 26 27 Complaint Filed: 11/21/14 Defendants. 28 / 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER {01408262.DOC} 1 Plaintiffs M.S., JEFFERY SMITH, ELIZABETH SMITH and Defendants COUNTY OF 2 LAKE, CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D., STANCIL 3 JOHNSON, M.D., ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY, and MANDY ROBBINS (erroneously 4 named MALADY ROBERTS), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate 5 to continue the Case Management Conference for thirty (30) days from the currently scheduled date of 6 May 26, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., to June 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. The parties submit good cause exists to 7 continue the conference in order to allow additional time necessary for all parties to make appearances. 8 The parties will file a Joint Status Report in advance of the new date in accordance with Local Rules. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 12 Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 13, 2015 13 ABBEY, WEITZENBERG, WARREN & EMERY, P.C. By: /s/ Scott Montgomery (authorized on 5/13/15) Michael D. Green Scott Montgomery Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 16 17 Dated: May 13, 2015 By: /s/ Jerome M. Varanini (authorized on 5/13/15) Jerome M. Varanini Attorney for Defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D., STANCIL JOHNSON, M.D., ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY, and MANDY ROBBINS 18 19 20 21 22 ATTORNEY GENERAL Date: May 13, 2015 23 24 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By: /s/ John R. Whitefleet John R. Whitefleet Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF LAKE 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER {01408262.DOC} 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER XXXXXXXX 2 3 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is 4 continued to June 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be 5 submitted in advance of the new date in accordance with Local Rules. 6 7 Dated:_____________________ May 14, 2015 8 _______________________________________ Magsitrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER {01408262.DOC}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?