M.S. v. County of Lake et al
Filing
28
ORDER Case Management Conference continued to 6/30/2015 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Nandor Vadas on 5/14/2015. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2015)
1
Michael D. Green SBN 214142
Scott R. Montgomery SBN 278060
ABBEY, WEITZENBERG,
WARREN & EMERY, P.C.
100 Stony Point Road, Suite 200
P.O. Box 1566
Santa Rosa, CA 95402
Tel: (707) 542 – 5050
Fax: (707) 542 – 2589
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2
3
4
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
5
Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF LAKE
6
11
Jerome M. Varanini SBN 58531
LAW OFFICES OF JEROME M. VARANINI
641 Fulton Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
P.O. Box 590
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Sacramento, CA 95812-0590
Tel: (916) 993-4868
Attorney for Defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D.,
STANCIL JOHNSON, M.D., ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY, and MANDY ROBBINS
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
9
10
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
M.S., a minor by and through her guardian ad
litem, JEFFERY SMITH, both individually and
in her capacity as successor-in-interest to
JAMES SMITH, deceased; JEFFERY SMITH;
and ELIZABETH SMITH
Case No.: 1:14-CV-05170-NJV
STIPULATION TO
MANAGEMENT
XXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiffs,
19
CONTINUE CASE
CONFERENCE;
Date: May 26, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
20
vs.
21
COUNTY OF LAKE; COUNTY OF LAKE
SHERIFF FRANCISCO RIVERO; COUNTY
OF LAKE DEPUTY SHERIFF WEAVER;
COUNTY OF LAKE DEPUTY SHERIFF
RODELLO; COUNTY OF LAKE DEPUTY
SHERIFF
VANOVEN;
CALIFORNIA
FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP; TAYLOR
FITHIAN, M.D.; STANCIL JOHNSON, M.D.;
ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY;
MALADY ROBERTS; and DOES 1-50;
22
23
24
25
26
27
Complaint Filed: 11/21/14
Defendants.
28
/
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
{01408262.DOC}
1
Plaintiffs M.S., JEFFERY SMITH, ELIZABETH SMITH and Defendants COUNTY OF
2
LAKE, CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D., STANCIL
3
JOHNSON, M.D., ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY, and MANDY ROBBINS (erroneously
4
named MALADY ROBERTS), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate
5
to continue the Case Management Conference for thirty (30) days from the currently scheduled date of
6
May 26, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., to June 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. The parties submit good cause exists to
7
continue the conference in order to allow additional time necessary for all parties to make appearances.
8
The parties will file a Joint Status Report in advance of the new date in accordance with Local Rules.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
12
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 13, 2015
13
ABBEY, WEITZENBERG, WARREN & EMERY, P.C.
By: /s/ Scott Montgomery (authorized on 5/13/15)
Michael D. Green
Scott Montgomery
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
16
17
Dated: May 13, 2015
By: /s/ Jerome M. Varanini (authorized on 5/13/15)
Jerome M. Varanini
Attorney for Defendants CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, TAYLOR FITHIAN, M.D., STANCIL JOHNSON,
M.D., ALISHA STOTTSBERRY; KC GRIGSBY, and MANDY
ROBBINS
18
19
20
21
22
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Date: May 13, 2015
23
24
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ John R. Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet
Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF LAKE
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
{01408262.DOC}
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
XXXXXXXX
2
3
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference is
4
continued to June 30, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be
5
submitted in advance of the new date in accordance with Local Rules.
6
7
Dated:_____________________
May 14, 2015
8
_______________________________________
Magsitrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
{01408262.DOC}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?