Brown, III
Filing
11
ORDER Dismissing Complaint with Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Nandor Vadas on 1/13/2015. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
EUREKA DIVISION
6
7
DENNIS BROWN,
No. C 14-5497 NJV (PR)
Plaintiff,
8
WARDEN RON DAVIS, et. al.,
Defendants.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
v.
9
/
12
13
Plaintiff, a prisoner being held in Alabama, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint
14
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc.
15
10.)
16
17
18
DISCUSSION
A.
Standard of Review
Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners
19
seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.
20
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and
21
dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may
22
be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at
23
1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police
24
Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990).
25
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only "a short and plain statement of
26
the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." "Specific facts are not necessary;
27
the statement need only '"give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . . claim is and the
28
grounds upon which it rests."'" Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (citations
allegations, . . . a plaintiff's obligation to provide the 'grounds’ of his 'entitle[ment] to relief'
3
requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a
4
cause of action will not do. . . . Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief
5
above the speculative level." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)
6
(citations omitted). A complaint must proffer "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is
7
plausible on its face." Id. at 570. The United States Supreme Court has recently explained
8
the “plausible on its face” standard of Twombly: “While legal conclusions can provide the
9
framework of a complaint, they must be supported by factual allegations. When there are
10
well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their veracity and then determine
11
For the Northern District of California
omitted). Although in order to state a claim a complaint “does not need detailed factual
2
United States District Court
1
whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,
12
679 (2009).
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential
13
14
elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was
15
violated, and (2) that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the
16
color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
17
B.
18
Legal Claims
Plaintiff states he is a former California State prisoner who had been incarcerated in
19
San Quentin State Prison and is now being held in county jail in Alabama for a probation
20
violation. He states that California inmates have attempted to have members of plaintiff’s
21
family murdered. He also states that in 2001 several corrections officials tried to have
22
plaintiff sign an agreement to have two devices that had been implanted in plaintiff
23
removed, but plaintiff refused to sign. In 2014, plaintiff alleges that he was assaulted in
24
Alabama by two men who described themselves as representatives from California. For
25
relief plaintiff seeks an investigation into these matters and monetary damages.
26
27
As currently pled, the complaint fails to state a claim. In order to obtain relief
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff must describe how a right secured by the
28
2
1
Constitution or laws of the United States was violated and that it was committed by a
2
person acting under the color of state law. Plaintiff will be provided one opportunity to
3
amend.
CONCLUSION
4
5
1. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend in accordance with the
6
standards set forth above. The amended complaint must be filed within twenty-eight (28)
7
days of the date this order is filed and must include the caption and civil case number used
8
in this order and the words AMENDED COMPLAINT on the first page. Because an
9
amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint, plaintiff must include in it all
the claims he wishes to present. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
1992). He may not incorporate material from the original complaint by reference. Failure to
12
amend within the designated time will result in the dismissal of this action.
13
2. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the
14
court informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed
15
“Notice of Change of Address,” and must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion.
16
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to
17
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 13, 2015.
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
EUREKA DIVISION
4
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
WARDEN RON DAVIS, et al,
Defendants.
10
11
No.14-CV-5497 NJV
DENNIS BROWN,
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on January 13, 2015, I served a true and correct copy
12
of the attached by placing said copies in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed
13
below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
14
15
16
17
Dennis Brown, III
#108821
Kilby Correctional Facility
P.O. Box 150
Mt. Meigs, AL 36057
18
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Linn Van Meter
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to the
Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?