Law v. Gooden et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 4/4/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISON
7
CARLOS GILBERT LAW,
8
Case No. 16-cv-4977-NJV (PR)
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v.
10
DEPUTY GOODEN, et. al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner. The court denied plaintiff’s
15
motion to proceed in forma pauperis finding that he had three or more strikes and was not under
16
imminent danger of serious physical injury. Plaintiff was ordered to pay the full filing fee within
17
twenty-eight days, or the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, but did file
18
a notice of change of address. 1 Because plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, despite being
19
provided additional time this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated: April 4, 2017
________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
1
26
27
28
In the complaint, plaintiff alleged that he was assaulted while at San Francisco County Jail and
defendants were employed by that facility. Plaintiff argued that he was transferred to California
Medical Facility and was in danger there. The court noted that he had filed a separate case
regarding that facility and none of the defendants in this case were employed there. Plaintiff has
now been transferred to Coalinga State Hospital and there are no allegations or defendants in this
complaint related to that facility.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?