Lazor v. Muniz et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 4/4/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

EUREKA DIVISON

7
8

FREE LAZOR aka, P.F. LAZOR

Case No. 16-cv-6585-NJV (PR)

Petitioner,
9
v.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

10
11

WILLIAM MUNIZ,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Respondent.
12
13
14

Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

15

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the denial of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings. The

16

petition was dismissed with leave to amend after the court found that petitioner failed to present a

17

federal claim. Petitioner was granted an extension of time and the amended petition was due by

18

February 17, 2017. That date has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or

19

otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED for the reasons stated

20

in the prior order and a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 4, 2017
________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge