Lazor v. Muniz et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 4/4/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISON 7 8 FREE LAZOR aka, P.F. LAZOR Case No. 16-cv-6585-NJV (PR) Petitioner, 9 v. ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 10 11 WILLIAM MUNIZ, United States District Court Northern District of California Respondent. 12 13 14 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 15 to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 challenging the denial of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings. The 16 petition was dismissed with leave to amend after the court found that petitioner failed to present a 17 federal claim. Petitioner was granted an extension of time and the amended petition was due by 18 February 17, 2017. That date has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or 19 otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED for the reasons stated 20 in the prior order and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 4, 2017 ________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?