County of Mendocino v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al

Filing 5

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Northern District of Ohio. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2018)

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
LITIGATION

MDL No. 2804

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 33)

On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407. See 290 F.Supp.3d 1375 (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 626 additional action(s)
have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such
actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge
Polster.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:
May 30, 2018

Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
I hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of
the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk
U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio
By: Robert Pitts
Deputy Clerk

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
LITIGATION

SCHEDULE CTO 33

DIST

DIV.

MDL No. 2804

TAG ALONG ACTIONS

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

County of Fresno v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation, et al.
County of Calaveras, et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Inyo, et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Madera, et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Mono v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Butte v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Nevada v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of El Dorado v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Siskiyou v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE

1

18 00634

CAE

1

18 00637

CAE

1

18 00639

CAE

1

18 00647

CAE

2

18 01149

CAE

2

18 01151

CAE

2

18 01152

CAE

2

18 01157

CAE

2

18 01167

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN

1

18 02712

CAN

1

18 02732

CAN

3

18 02705

CAN

3

18 02730

CAN

5

18 02733

County of Mendocino v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Del Norte v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Contra Costa v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
County of Marin v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
County of San Benito v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN
CAS

3

18 00892

County of Imperial et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

GEORGIA SOUTHERN
18 00041

City of Alma, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

2

18 04828

Gusman v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al

MD

1

18 01367

MD

1

18 01368

MD

1

18 01382

MD

1

18 01383

City of Hagerstown, Maryland v. Amerisourcebergen
Drug Corporation et al
City of Cumberland, Maryland v AmerisourceBergen
Drug Corporation, et al.
Allegany County, Maryland v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al
City of Frostburg v. Amerisourcebergen Drug
Corporation et al

GAS

5

LOUISIANA EASTERN
LAE
MARYLAND