Gilmore, et al v. People of California

Filing 306

ORDER granting relief from page limit re 296 . (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:66-cv-45878-SI Document298 Filed12/30/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.' Mot. Admin. Relief Extend Page Limit Defs.' Reply Br. Supp. Mot. Term. Inj. (CV 66-45878 SI) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ROBERT O. GILMORE, JR., et al., Case No. CV 66-45878 SI Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR v. ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND THE PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., SUPPORTING DEFENDANTS' TERMINATION MOTION Defendants. Case3:66-cv-45878-SI Document298 Filed12/30/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants filed a motion for administrative relief requesting leave to file a reply brief in support of their motion to terminate injunctive relief that is up to 20 pages long. The Court has read and considered Defendants' motion and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to file a reply brief that is up to 20 pages long is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Dated: ___________________________ __________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston U.S. District Court Judge 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.' Mot. Admin. Relief Extend Page Limit Defs.' Reply Br. Supp. Mot. Term. Inj. (CV 66-45878 SI)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?