Securities And Exchange Commission v. Amundsen
Filing
29
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO SEC REPLY re 28 Brief filed by Joseph S. Amundsen. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 29, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C 83-00711 WHA
ORDER STRIKING
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER
TO SEC REPLY
v.
JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Pro se defendant Joseph Amundsen has filed an “answer to SEC reply to defendant’s
18
answer to find defendant in civil contempt” (Dkt. No. 28). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d)
19
“once a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior
20
Court approval” unless new evidence has been submitted in the reply brief or the party seeks to
21
file a statement of recent decision. Plaintiff filed its reply on November 22, 2011. The recent
22
filing by defendant appears to be a summary of defendant’s response brief and does not fall
23
within one of the exceptions under Rule 7-3(d). Defendant did not obtain prior approval to make
24
this filing. Thus, defendant’s answer to the SEC reply is STRICKEN.
25
26
27
28
1
2
*
*
*
In the recent filing, defendant asks for the exact location of the hearing. The hearing will
3
be held in Courtroom 8, on the 19th Floor, U.S. District Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue,
4
San Francisco, CA 94102.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: November 29, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?