Securities And Exchange Commission v. Amundsen

Filing 29

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO SEC REPLY re 28 Brief filed by Joseph S. Amundsen. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 29, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. C 83-00711 WHA ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SEC REPLY v. JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN, Defendant. / 16 17 Pro se defendant Joseph Amundsen has filed an “answer to SEC reply to defendant’s 18 answer to find defendant in civil contempt” (Dkt. No. 28). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) 19 “once a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior 20 Court approval” unless new evidence has been submitted in the reply brief or the party seeks to 21 file a statement of recent decision. Plaintiff filed its reply on November 22, 2011. The recent 22 filing by defendant appears to be a summary of defendant’s response brief and does not fall 23 within one of the exceptions under Rule 7-3(d). Defendant did not obtain prior approval to make 24 this filing. Thus, defendant’s answer to the SEC reply is STRICKEN. 25 26 27 28 1 2 * * * In the recent filing, defendant asks for the exact location of the hearing. The hearing will 3 be held in Courtroom 8, on the 19th Floor, U.S. District Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 4 San Francisco, CA 94102. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: November 29, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?