Colleen Mary Rohan, et al v. Jill Brown, et al
Filing
949
ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting 946 Motion clarification of minute order.(whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2021)
Case 3:88-cv-02779-WHA Document 949 Filed 08/11/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
COLLEEN MARY ROHAN, ex rel.
OSCAR GATES,
No. C 88-02779 WHA
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Petitioner,
12
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
13
14
15
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden
San Quentin State Prison,
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
At the request of the parties, a status conference was held on August 4, 2021, during
18
which the evidentiary hearing scheduled for August 16 and 17 was continued to
19
October 25--27 and various deadlines relating to discovery in advance of the hearing were
20
established. Petitioner has now filed a motion seeking clarification of the Court’s intent in
21
light of certain docket text included in the minutes of the conference entered on the docket.
22
In short, the deadlines set forth in the docket text were included because those deadlines —
23
imposing a deposition cutoff and requiring disclosure of expert reports — were revised from
24
earlier dates set by the Court before hearing argument from the parties. Specifically, due to
25
concerns expressed by both parties, the deadline for expert reports was moved from August 31
26
to September 24, and the deadline for completion of all depositions was moved to October 15.
27
Other deadlines established at the conference, including disclosure of witnesses and intended
28
Case 3:88-cv-02779-WHA Document 949 Filed 08/11/21 Page 2 of 2
1
subpoenas and identification of witnesses a party wishes to depose, were not amended in view
2
of the parties’ argument and therefore remain binding.
3
Accordingly, to the extent set forth in this Order, Petitioner’s Motion for Clarification of
4
August 4, 2021 Minute Order (Docket No. 946) is GRANTED. Respondent has complied with
5
the deadline for providing a list of his proposed witnesses and identifying those individuals or
6
entities he intends to subpoena. See Docket No. 948. Petitioner shall do the same within
7
twenty-four hours of the entry of this order so that the parties may continue their preparation
8
for the hearing.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Dated: August 11, 2021.
13
14
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?