Curtis Sneede, et al v. Kenneth Kizer, et al
Filing
316
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Enlarge Time to Address 309 MOTION to Alter Judgment. Responses due by 9/23/2013. Replies due by 10/7/2013. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/28/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
MARTHA JANE PERKINS, SBN 104784
National Health Law Program
101 E. Weaver St., Ste. G-7
Carrboro, N.C. 27156
Telephone: (919) 968-6308
Facsimile: (919) 968-8855
Email: perkins@healthlaw.org
KIMBERLY LEWIS, SBN 144879
BYRON J. GROSS, SBN 76626
National Health Law Program
3701 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. #750
Los Angeles, C.A. 90010
Telephone: (310) 204-6010
Facsimile: (213) 368-0774
Email: lewis@healthlaw.org, gross@healthlaw.org
Attorneys for the Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case No. 89-CV-1932 (TEH)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
KATHLEEN G. SEBELIUS, Secretary of )
the United States Department of Health )
)
and Human Services, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
CURTIS SNEEDE, et al.,
SECOND STIPULATION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO ADDRESS
DEFENDANT SEBELIUS
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Hearing Date: Sept. 30, 2013
Proposed Hearing Date: Oct. 21, 2013
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: San Francisco U.S. Courthouse
Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson
This second stipulation to enlarge time is being filed pursuant to L.R. 6-2. Defendant
Sebelius filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Relief from Judgment on July 22, 2013 (D.E.
309).
1
WHEREAS on July 31, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation to Enlarge Time to Address
WHEREAS on July 31, 2013 the Court issued an Order to enlarge time, with the Order
docketed on August 1, 2013 (D.E. 312);
WHEREAS under the current Order,
Relief from Judgment shall be filed by August 30, 2013; any Reply by Defendant Sebelius in
support of her Motion for Relief from Judgment shall be filed by September 12, 2013; and the
hearing is set for September 30, 2013 ; and
WHEREAS the parties are actively engaged in ongoing settlement discussions
concerning the issues raised in
from Judgment.
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT the Court issue an order
to enlarge time for addressing Defendant Sebelius
all Responses to Defendant Sebelius
and that
will be filed by
September 23; Defendant Sebelius will file her Reply by October 7; the new hearing date is
proposed for October 21, 2013.
Date: August 27, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Martha Jane Perkins_____
Martha Jane Perkins
National Health Law Program
101 E. Weaver St., Ste. G-7
Carrboro, N.C. 27516
Tel.: (919) 968-6308 (x101)
Fax: (919) 968-8855
Email: perkins@healthlaw.org
/s/ Hadara Stanton
Hadara Stanton
Deputy Attorney General
California Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Ave., Ste. 11000
2
San Francisco, C.A. 94102-7004
Tel.: (415) 703-5561
Fax: (415) 703-5480
Email: Hadara.Stanton@doj.ca.gov
/s/ Justin M. Sandberg
Justin M. Sandberg
Trial Attorney
United State Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Room7302
Washington, D.C. 20001
Tel.: (202) 514-5838
Fax: (202) 616-8202
Email: Justin.Sandberg@usdoj.gov
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES ABOVE, and good cause
appearing, the Court hereby issues an order to enlarge time to address Defendant Sebelius
Motion for Relief from Judgment such that all
Relief from Judgment shall be filed by September 23, 2013; any Reply by Defendant Sebelius in
support of her Motion for Relief from Judgment shall be filed by October 7, 2013; the hearing
will be set for October 21, 2013.
S
UNIT
ED
n
FO
NO
nderso
n E. He
e Thelto
g
H
LI
RT
Jud
ER
3
R NIA
_______________________________
Judge Thelton E. Henderson
United States District Judge
A
28
August __, 2013
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?