Fslic v. Thomas M. Day

Filing 48

ORDER re Supplemental Briefing and/or Evidence. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/10/2012. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION,

No. C-89-2618 SAW

9
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE

v.
11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
THOMAS M. DAY,
12
Defendant.
13
___________________________________/
14
15
16

The Court has reviewed FDIC’s ex parte motion to renew the judgment. See Docket No. 44

17

(motion). Having reviewed such, the Court hereby orders FDIC to provide supplemental briefing

18

and/or evidence in support of its motion. More specifically, the Court orders FDIC to certify that the

19

address where Mr. Day was served is, to the best of its knowledge, the last known address of Mr.

20

Day and that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, FDIC is not aware of another address for Mr.

21

Day. In addition, the Court orders FDIC to clarify who Aaron Paul, Esq. is (e.g., Mr. Day’s former

22

counsel)1, whether Mr. Paul was contacted in ascertaining an address for Mr. Day, and whether Mr.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27
28

1

Mr. Paul was served with FDIC’s prior motion to renew the judgment (filed back in
December 2001).

1
2

Paul still serves as counsel for Mr. Day.
Supplemental papers shall be filed and served within a week of the date of this order.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: January 10, 2012

7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2