Taylor v. Brown, et al

Filing 258

ORDER Re Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/6/2015. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 FREDDIE LEE TAYLOR, 9 No. C-92-1627 EMC Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 v. RON DAVIS, Acting Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 12 13 Respondent. ___________________________________/ 14 15 16 The Court is in receipt of the parties’ proposed briefing schedule, and hereby orders the 17 following briefing schedule regarding merits briefing on record-based claims. The parties are 18 ordered to brief the following guilt-phase claims: Claims 3A, 12C, 12D and 15. To the extent they 19 concern guilt-phase issues, the parties are also ordered to brief Claims 11 and 18. Petitioner’s 20 opening brief is due on or before July 30, 2015. Respondent’s opposition is due on or before 21 September 24, 2015. Any reply brief is due on or before October 29, 2015. The parties are strongly 22 encouraged to adhere to the page limits set by Local Rule 7.4 (b), absent a significant showing that 23 oversize briefs are necessary. Any request to file an oversize brief must be filed at least seven days 24 before the brief in question is due. The Court will set a hearing date if necessary. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 A Status Conference is set for 10:30 a.m., November 12, 2015. A Joint Status Conference Statement shall be filed by November 5, 2015. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: April 6, 2015 7 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?