Ashmus v. Ayers
Filing
395
ORDER regarding documents reviewed in camera. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/10/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 03/10/09 __________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON United States Senior District Judge v. Robert K. WONG, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Respondent. The Court has reviewed in camera seventy-two documents submitted by Petitioner. Good cause appearing therefor, the Court finds and concludes that Documents 123, 2533, and 3672 are not relevant in the present action and therefore are not subject to discovery. However, Documents 24, 34, and 35 are relevant, and the protective order entered in this matter resolves any concerns related to privileges and the work-product doctrine. Petitioner shall disclose Documents 24, 34, and 35 to Respondent within ten days after the filing of the present order. It is so ordered. Troy Adam ASHMUS, Petitioner, Case Number 3-93-cv-594-TEH DEATH-PENALTY CASE ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENTS REVIEWED IN CAMERA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case No. 3-93-cv-594-TEH ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENTS REVIEWED IN CAMERA (DPSAGOK)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
