Ashmus v. Ayers
Filing
496
STIPULATION AND ORDER Amending Post-Hearing Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/12/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN FRANCISCO HEADQUARTERS
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
TROY A. ASHMUS,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL MARTEL, Acting Warden of )
California State Prison at San Quentin,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
Case Number 3:93-cv-00594-TEH
DEATH PENALTY CASE
PROPOSED] ORDER SCHEDULING POSTHEARING BRIEFING
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the parties are ordered:
15
1.
On or before September 15, 2011, Petitioner will file the Petitioner’s Reply Brief on
16
Claim Seven. Following the submission of briefing, the Court will schedule oral argument on Claim
17
Seven.
18
2.
On or before October 3, 2011, Petitioner will file Petitioner’s Opening Brief on Claims
19
Four and Five. On or before December 12, 2011, Respondent will file Respondent’s Brief on Claims
20
Four and Five. On or before January 9, 2011, Petitioner shall file the Petitioner’s Reply Brief on
21
Claims Four and Five. Following the submission of briefing, the Court will schedule oral argument
22
on Claims Four and Five.
23
S
UNIT
ED
9/12
Dated: __________________, 2011
son
Hender
Ju
RT
28
lton E.
dge The
ER
H
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING POST-HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Ashmus v. Martel, No. 3:93-cv-00594-TEH
3
FO
NO
27
LI
26
R NIA
____________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United Stated Senior District Judge
A
25
RT
U
O
24
It is so ordered.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?