Ashmus v. Ayers

Filing 496

STIPULATION AND ORDER Amending Post-Hearing Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/12/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO HEADQUARTERS 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 TROY A. ASHMUS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL MARTEL, Acting Warden of ) California State Prison at San Quentin, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Case Number 3:93-cv-00594-TEH DEATH PENALTY CASE PROPOSED] ORDER SCHEDULING POSTHEARING BRIEFING 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the parties are ordered: 15 1. On or before September 15, 2011, Petitioner will file the Petitioner’s Reply Brief on 16 Claim Seven. Following the submission of briefing, the Court will schedule oral argument on Claim 17 Seven. 18 2. On or before October 3, 2011, Petitioner will file Petitioner’s Opening Brief on Claims 19 Four and Five. On or before December 12, 2011, Respondent will file Respondent’s Brief on Claims 20 Four and Five. On or before January 9, 2011, Petitioner shall file the Petitioner’s Reply Brief on 21 Claims Four and Five. Following the submission of briefing, the Court will schedule oral argument 22 on Claims Four and Five. 23 S UNIT ED 9/12 Dated: __________________, 2011 son Hender Ju RT 28 lton E. dge The ER H STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING POST-HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Ashmus v. Martel, No. 3:93-cv-00594-TEH 3 FO NO 27 LI 26 R NIA ____________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON United Stated Senior District Judge A 25 RT U O 24 It is so ordered. S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?