Ashmus v. Ayers
Filing
512
STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING POST-HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 511 . Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/30/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN FRANCISCO HEADQUARTERS
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
TROY A. ASHMUS,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
KEVIN CHAPPELLE, Acting Warden of )
California State Prison at San Quentin,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
Case Number 3:93-cv-00594-TEH
DEATH PENALTY CASE
[PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING POSTHEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the parties are ordered:
15
1.
16
and Five.
17
2.
22
Petitioner may file a Supplemental Reply Brief on Claims Four and Five no later than
30 days after Respondent files any Supplemental Answering Brief.
4.
Following the submission of briefing, the Court will schedule oral argument on
Claims Four and Five.
23
26
04/30
Dated: __________________, 2012
UNIT
ED
25
S
It is so ordered.
RT
U
O
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
NO
27
RT
28
____________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United Stated Senior District Judge
erson
4 E
H
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
AMENDING POST-HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Ashmus v. Chappelle, No. 3:93-cv-00594-TEH
R NIA
21
3.
nd
. He
helton E
Judge T
FO
20
Claims Four and Five.
LI
19
On or before June 21, 2012, Respondent may file a Supplemental Answering Brief on
RN
A
18
On or before May 3, 2012, Petitioner will file Petitioner’s Reply Brief on Claims Four
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?