Ashmus v. Ayers

Filing 512

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING POST-HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 511 . Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/30/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO HEADQUARTERS 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 TROY A. ASHMUS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) KEVIN CHAPPELLE, Acting Warden of ) California State Prison at San Quentin, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Case Number 3:93-cv-00594-TEH DEATH PENALTY CASE [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING POSTHEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the parties are ordered: 15 1. 16 and Five. 17 2. 22 Petitioner may file a Supplemental Reply Brief on Claims Four and Five no later than 30 days after Respondent files any Supplemental Answering Brief. 4. Following the submission of briefing, the Court will schedule oral argument on Claims Four and Five. 23 26 04/30 Dated: __________________, 2012 UNIT ED 25 S It is so ordered. RT U O 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA NO 27 RT 28 ____________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON United Stated Senior District Judge erson 4 E H STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING POST-HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Ashmus v. Chappelle, No. 3:93-cv-00594-TEH R NIA 21 3. nd . He helton E Judge T FO 20 Claims Four and Five. LI 19 On or before June 21, 2012, Respondent may file a Supplemental Answering Brief on RN A 18 On or before May 3, 2012, Petitioner will file Petitioner’s Reply Brief on Claims Four D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?