UTHE Technology Corp v. Allen, et al

Filing 175

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF EXPERT DEADLINES by Hon. William Alsup denying 171 Ex Parte Application.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
UTHE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

No. C 95-02377 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF EXPERT
DEADLINES

HARRY ALLEN and AETRIUM
INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
/

16
17

Plaintiff moved on May 28 for an extension of the (now expired) May 31 deadline for

18

disclosure of opening expert reports. Plaintiff contends that its expert needs an extra two weeks

19

to adjust his expert opinion because plaintiff has been unable to find an alternate source of

20

information once stored in documents allegedly destroyed by defendants in 1992. Defendants

21

oppose, inter alia, on the ground that plaintiff cannot show good cause for an extension because

22

defendants completed their document production nearly six months ago. This order agrees that

23

good cause has not been shown under Rule 16 to modify the case management scheduling order.

24

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for an extension is DENIED.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: June 5, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE