UTHE Technology Corp v. Allen, et al
Filing
199
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/13/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2013)
Case3:95-cv-02377-WHA Document197-1 Filed09/12/13 Page2 of 2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
3
4
5 UTHE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
6
Case No. 3:95-cv-02377-WHA
Plaintiff,
7
v.
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
8 HARRY ALLEN and AETRIUM
INCORPORATED,
9
Defendants.
10
11
For the reasons stated in the September 27, 2012 order (Docket Entry 144) and the
12
September 9, 2013 order (Docket Entry 195), FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of
13
Defendants Harry Allen and Aetrium Incorporated, and against Plaintiff Uthe Technology
14
Corporation. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. In light of plaintiff's large victory in Singapore,
15 during which time this action was stayed as to defendants Harry Allen and Aetrium Inc., it is not fair
to treat those two defendants as prevailing parties. Therefore, costs are denied as to both sides.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated:
September 13, 2013.
19
Honorable William H. Alsup
United States District Court
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AM 239202211
[PROPOSED] JUDGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?