UTHE Technology Corp v. Allen, et al

Filing 212

ORDER SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SCHEDULING TRIAL re 211 MOTION for Hearing filed by Harry Allen, Aetrium, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 211 MOTION for Hearing, [ 210] MOTION for Summary Judgment., Motions terminated: 211 MOTION for Hearing filed by Harry Allen, Aetrium, Inc.. Responses due by 3/14/2016. Replies due by 3/21/2016. Motion Hearing set for 3/31/2016 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/15/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 6/22/2016 07:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/11/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

UTHE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 95-02377 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.
HARRY ALLEN and AETRIUM,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
/

ORDER SETTING HEARING
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR DEFENDANTS’
RENEWED MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND SCHEDULING TRIAL

14
15

The mandate of the Ninth Circuit issued on January 5 (Dkt. No. 208). On January 8,

16

defendants filed a renewed motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 210). Defendants also

17

requested that the Court schedule a hearing on the renewed motion for March 31 and proposed

18

to have the parties each submit supplemental briefs by March 17 addressing relevant

19

developments in the law since the Court considered defendants’ motion to dismiss in 2013

20

(Dkt. No. 211). Defendants’ proposal did not provide for the parties to respond to the

21

supplemental briefs. The Court hereby sets the following schedule:

22

1.

A hearing on defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment is
scheduled for MARCH 31, 2016 AT 8:00 A.M.

23

2.

By MARCH 14, the parties shall submit supplemental briefs NOT TO
EXCEED FOUR PAGES, double spaced with no footnotes or attachments,
discussing relevant developments in the law.

3.

By MARCH 21, the parties shall respond to each others’ supplemental
briefs.

4.

The parties shall please LODGE chambers copies of the briefs and the
record from the prior motion for summary judgment by JANUARY 22.

24
25
26
27
28

1
2

The Court further SETS a Final Pretrial Conference for JUNE 15 AT 2:00 P.M., for a jury
trial to begin on JUNE 22 AT 7:30 A.M.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: January 11, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2