UTHE Technology Corp v. Allen, et al
Filing
214
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE MOTION PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/8/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 95-02377 WHA
UTHE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE
MOTION PERMITTING
WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
HARRY ALLEN and AETRIUM,
INCORPORATED,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
Before the Court rules on plaintiff’s motion to withdraw and substitute counsel,
18
plaintiff’s counsel will please submit an explanation showing good cause for the substitution.
19
The Court is concerned over the extreme age of the case and further concerned about the effect
20
of losing the history and knowledge of this case acquired by plaintiff’s original counsel and any
21
delay that will result from this substitution. Counsel’s response is due FRIDAY, MARCH 11 AT
22
NOON.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 8, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?