UTHE Technology Corp v. Allen, et al

Filing 214

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE MOTION PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/8/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 95-02377 WHA UTHE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE MOTION PERMITTING WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL HARRY ALLEN and AETRIUM, INCORPORATED, 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Before the Court rules on plaintiff’s motion to withdraw and substitute counsel, 18 plaintiff’s counsel will please submit an explanation showing good cause for the substitution. 19 The Court is concerned over the extreme age of the case and further concerned about the effect 20 of losing the history and knowledge of this case acquired by plaintiff’s original counsel and any 21 delay that will result from this substitution. Counsel’s response is due FRIDAY, MARCH 11 AT 22 NOON. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 8, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?