State of California, et al v. Remco Hydraulics Inc, et al

Filing 734

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE 2006 AMENDED FINAL CONSENT DECREE TO PERMIT THE FRANK R. HOWARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TO USE EXISTING SETTLEMENT FUNDS TO PURCHASE NECESSARY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 728 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 v. REMCO HYDRAULICS INC., et al., Defendants. 16 / No. C 96-283 SI ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE 2006 AMENDED FINAL CONSENT DECREE TO PERMIT THE FRANK R. HOWARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TO USE EXISTING SETTLEMENT FUNDS TO PURCHASE NECESSARY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 17 18 Plaintiffs’ motion for an order modifying the 2006 amended final consent decree is scheduled 19 for a hearing on May 18, 2012. Defendants have filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion. 20 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate for resolution 21 without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. The Court has reviewed the papers submitted and 22 GRANTS plaintiff’s motion as follows: 23 1. The Amended Final Consent Decree entered by this Court on December 22, 2000, as 24 amended by this Court on or about December 18, 2006, is hereby amended as necessary to permit the 25 existing Settlement Funds identified in the 2006 Amended Final Consent Decree to be used toward the 26 purchase of equipment necessary to provide essential health care services at the New Hospital, such as 27 X-Ray machines, Magnetic Resonance Imaging machines, Defibrillators and other necessary equipment. 28 1 2 3 4 5 2. Other than as set forth herein, the Amended Final Consent Decree, as amended by this Court on or about December 18, 2006, remains in full force and effect. 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action for purposes of resolving any dispute(s) regarding implementation of Paragraph 1 of this Order. This order resolves Docket No. 728. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: May 7, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?