State of California, et al v. Remco Hydraulics Inc, et al
Filing
734
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE 2006 AMENDED FINAL CONSENT DECREE TO PERMIT THE FRANK R. HOWARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TO USE EXISTING SETTLEMENT FUNDS TO PURCHASE NECESSARY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 728 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et
al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
v.
REMCO HYDRAULICS INC., et al.,
Defendants.
16
/
No. C 96-283 SI
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ORDER
MODIFYING THE 2006 AMENDED
FINAL CONSENT DECREE TO PERMIT
THE FRANK R. HOWARD MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL TO USE EXISTING
SETTLEMENT FUNDS TO PURCHASE
NECESSARY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
17
18
Plaintiffs’ motion for an order modifying the 2006 amended final consent decree is scheduled
19
for a hearing on May 18, 2012. Defendants have filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion.
20
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the matter is appropriate for resolution
21
without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. The Court has reviewed the papers submitted and
22
GRANTS plaintiff’s motion as follows:
23
1.
The Amended Final Consent Decree entered by this Court on December 22, 2000, as
24
amended by this Court on or about December 18, 2006, is hereby amended as necessary to permit the
25
existing Settlement Funds identified in the 2006 Amended Final Consent Decree to be used toward the
26
purchase of equipment necessary to provide essential health care services at the New Hospital, such as
27
X-Ray machines, Magnetic Resonance Imaging machines, Defibrillators and other necessary equipment.
28
1
2
3
4
5
2.
Other than as set forth herein, the Amended Final Consent Decree, as amended by this
Court on or about December 18, 2006, remains in full force and effect.
3.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action
for purposes of resolving any dispute(s) regarding implementation of Paragraph 1 of this Order.
This order resolves Docket No. 728.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: May 7, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?