Clark, et al v. State of California, et al

Filing 452

ORDER vacating writ of Ronald Blake issued on March 23, 2010 re 438 Proposed Order filed by Derrick Clark. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/6/10. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

P R IS O N LAW OFFICE D O N A L D SPECTER ­ 83925 S A R A NORMAN ­ 189536 S U S A N CHRISTIAN ­ 121210 P E N N Y GODBOLD ­ 226925 Z O E SCHONFELD - 243755 G e n era l Delivery S a n Quentin, California 94964 T e le p h o n e : [phone] J O N E S DAY C A R O L IN E MITCHELL ­ 143124 D O U G L A S ROBERTS ­ 264451 A N D R E W VERRIERE ­ 264674 5 5 5 California Street, 26th Floor S a n Francisco, CA 94104-1500 T e le p h o n e : [phone] F a x : [phone] A tto rn e ys for Plaintiffs

E D M U N D G. BROWN JR. A tto rn e y General of California J O N A T H A N L. WOLFF S e n io r Assistant Attorney General D A N IE L L E F. O'BANNON D e p u ty Attorney General J U L I A N N E MOSSLER D e p u ty Attorney General J O S E A. ZELIDON-ZEPEDA D e p u ty Attorney General S ta te Bar No. 227108 4 5 5 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 S a n Francisco, CA 94102-7004 T e le p h o n e : [phone] F a x : [phone] E -m a il: [e-mail] A tto rn e ys for Defendants State of C a lifo rn ia, et al.

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R IC T C O U R T N O R T H E R N D I S T R IC T O F C A L I F O R N I A S A N FRANCISCO DIVISION D E R R IC K CLARK, et al., ) ) P l a i n t if f s , ) ) ) v. ) ) ) S T A T E OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ) ) D e f e n d a n ts . ) _________________________________)

C a s e No. C 96-1486 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] O R D E R TO VACATE WRIT OF H A B E A S CORPUS AD T E S T IF IC A N D U M FOR RONALD BLAKE Judge: H o n . Charles R. Breyer A c tio n filed: April 22, 1996

T H E PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad T e s tif ic a n d u m for Ronald Blake, issued on March 23, 2010 (Docket #356), be vacated. M r. Blake is housed at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State P ris o n at Corcoran.
S t ip u la t io n and Order Vacating W r it Ad Testificandum C l a r k v. California, C 96-1486 CRB

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

D e f en d a n ts agree to this stipulation based on plaintiffs' representation that the R e c eiv e r's Office has made its facilities available to allow Mr. Blake to testify by v id e o c o n fe re n c in g . The parties stipulate that any logistical problems involving the v id e o c o n f e re n c in g must be resolved by plaintiffs' counsel. If Mr. Blake is not able to tes tify through the Receiver's videoconferencing system, defendants will not agree to a llo w h im to te s tif y th ro u g h his deposition. S O STIPULATED: D a te d : May 5, 2010 P R IS O N LAW OFFICE /s/ S A R A NORMAN A tto rn e y s for Plaintiffs

D a te d : May 5, 2010

E D M U N D G. BROWN JR. A tto rn e y General of California /s/ J O S E A. ZELIDON-ZEPEDA D e p u ty Attorney General A tto rn e y s for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED. D a te d :
5/6/10

_________________________ N a n d o r J. Vadas U n ite d States Magistrate Judge

S t ip u la t io n and Order Vacating W r it Ad Testificandum C l a r k v. California, C 96-1486 CRB

2