Emma C., et al v. Eastin, et al

Filing 1705

STIPULATION AND ORDER re Payment of Plaintiffs' Attorneys' Fees and Costs for the Period of July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/29/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Arlene B. Mayerson, Esq., CA Bar # 79310 Larisa M. Cummings, Esq., CA Bar # 131076 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. 3075 Adeline Street, Suite 210 Berkeley, CA 94703 Telephone: (510) 644-2555 Fax: (510) 841-8645 Email: amayerson@dredf.org Email: lcummings@dredf.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JULIE WENG-GUTIERREZ Senior Assistant Attorney General LISA A. TILLMAN Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 126424 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 327-7872 Fax: (916) 324-5567 E-mail: Lisa.Tillman@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for State Defendants William S. Koski, Esq., CA. Bar #166061 STANFORD LAW SCHOOL YOUTH & EDUCATION LAW PROJECT 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 Telephone: (650) 724-3718 Fax: (650) 723-4426 Email: bkoski@stanford.edu Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL P. MURPHY COUNTY COUNSEL (SBN 83887) BY: AIMEE B. ARMSBY, DEPUTY (SBN 226967) Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (650) 363-4647 Facsimile: (650) 363-4034 Email: aarmsby@co.sanmateo.ca.us Attorneys for Defendant Ravenswood City School District 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 22 EMMA C., et al. Plaintiffs, vs. DELAINE EASTIN, et al., Case No. C-96-4179 (TEH) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE: PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Counsel for the parties have prepared a stipulated order for the payment by defendants of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs in this action for the period of July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Based on billing statements and discussions among the parties, attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $19,133.19 will be paid to the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund; and [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS OF JULY THRU DECEMBER 2011 Emma C. et al., v. Delaine Eastin, et al.; CASE NO. C-96-4179 (TEH) 1 attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $25,540.28 will be paid to the Youth and Education 2 Law Project. 3 4 In accord with the previous agreements of defendants, the attorneys’ fees and costs awards shall be shared equally by the California Department of Education and the Ravenswood 5 6 7 City School District. Upon entry of this Court’s order approving this stipulation, defendants will timely seek 8 the necessary agency approvals for preparation and relay of the checks. The checks will be 9 provided to plaintiffs’ counsels within 60 days of obtaining such agency approvals. 10 11 12 Dated: March 28, 2012 Respectfully submitted, DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. 13 By: 14 15 16 /s/ Larisa M. Cummings Attorneys for Plaintiff Emma C. . YOUTH AND EDUCATION LAW PROJECT 17 18 By: 19 20 /s/ William S. Koski Attorneys for Plaintiff Emma C. . COUNTY COUNSEL OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 21 22 By: 23 /s/ . Aimee B. Armsby, Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Ravenswood City School District 24 OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL 25 26 27 By: /s/ Lisa A. Tillman, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for State Defendants . 28 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS OF JULY THRU DECEMBER 2011 Emma C. et al., v. Delaine Eastin, et al.; CASE NO. C-96-4179 (THE) ECF ATTESTATION 1 2 3 4 5 I am the efiling attorney whose ECF User Identification and Password are being used to electronically file the following document(s): [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE: PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 6 7 8 9 In compliance with General Order 45, Section X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the above document(s) has been obtained from the signatory(ies). DATED: March 28, 2012 /s/ Lisa A. Tillman LISA A. TILLMAN 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS OF JULY THRU DECEMBER 2011 Emma C. et al., v. Delaine Eastin, et al.; CASE NO. C-96-4179 (THE) 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER 2 RE: PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 3 FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 4 5 In view of the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing thereof, the California 6 11 Education and Defense Fund, Inc.; and attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $25,540.28 will be paid to the Youth and Education Law Project. The payments shall be equally divided between the California State Department of 12 13 Education and the Ravenswood City School District. Upon entry of this Court’s order approving this stipulation, defendants will timely seek 14 15 16 the necessary agency approvals for preparation and relay of the checks. The checks will be provided to plaintiff counsels within 60 days of obtaining such agency approvals. IT IS SO ORDERED. 03/29/2012 Dated: _________________ 19 _________________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON 20 NO United States DistrictHenderson Judge . helton E Judge T RT 21 H ER 22 23 UNIT ED 18 RT U O S 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA ////// R NIA 10 Attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $19,133.19 will be paid to the Disability Rights FO 9 attorneys’ fees and costs in this action for the period of July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. LI 8 Department of Education and the Ravenswood City School District shall pay plaintiffs’ A 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ ATTORNEYS’ FEES & COSTS OF JULY THRU DECEMBER 2011 Emma C. et al., v. Delaine Eastin, et al.; CASE NO. C-96-4179 (THE)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?