Emma C., et al v. Eastin, et al

Filing 1938

ORDER construing 1933 MOTION to Strike 1925 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed by California Department of Education as objection to Plaintiffs' evidence. Plaintiffs' response to CDE's objection due by 6/4/14. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 5/28/14. (tehlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2014) Modified on 5/28/2014 (tmi, COURT STAFF).

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

EMMA C., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

5
6
7
8

v.
DELAINE EASTIN, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 96-cv-04179-TEH
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION’S MOTION TO
STRIKE

9
10

On May 21, 2014, Defendant California Department of Education (“CDE”) moved

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

to strike the report of Sam Howarth, which Plaintiffs submitted in support of their

12

opposition to CDE’s motion to set aside the Monitor’s January 9, 2014 determinations.

13

The Court will construe CDE’s motion to strike as an objection to evidence rather than a

14

noticed motion. Accordingly, the briefing schedule based on Civil Local Rule 7-3, which

15

governs noticed motions, is vacated. Plaintiffs shall file a response to CDE’s objection on

16

or before June 4, 2014, and the matter will then be deemed submitted.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 5/28/14

_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge