Emma C., et al v. Eastin, et al

Filing 2013

ORDER Re: Process to Approve and Implement CDE Corrective Action Plan Per the Court's July 2, 2014 Order. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/15/15. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 EMMA C., et al., Plaintiffs, 5 6 7 8 v. DELAINE EASTIN, et al., Defendants. Case No. 96-cv-04179-TEH ORDER RE: PROCESS TO APPROVE AND IMPLEMENT CDE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN PER THE COURT’S JULY 2, 2014 ORDER 9 10 In its July 2, 2014 Order, the Court directed the Court Monitor to develop a United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”) to achieve the outcomes set forth in the Monitor’s January 12 9, 2014 Determinations Report regarding the CDE’s statewide monitoring system. The 13 Court now informs the Parties of the process to approve and implement the draft CAP: 14 1. The Monitor expects to send the draft CAP to the Parties by February 13, 2015. 15 2. After receiving the draft CAP, the Parties have three weeks to submit 16 comments/objections to the Monitor. As the July 2 Order upheld the January 9 17 Determinations, any objections to the draft CAP shall not include objections to the 18 substance of the Determinations. This will not constitute a waiver of those objections. 19 20 21 3. There will then be a 30 day meet and confer period between the Parties and the Monitor regarding the submitted comments/objections. 4. The Monitor shall then file a memorandum with the Court addressing the 22 comments/objections made by the Parties, and submitting the draft CAP for approval. 23 5. The Parties then have three weeks to file motions formally objecting to the draft CAP. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: 01/15/15 _____________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?