Emma C., et al v. Eastin, et al

Filing 2065

REVISED ORDER re: 2064 Order on FY 2015-2016 Budget by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/18/15. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2015)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

EMMA C., et al.,

Case No. 96-cv-04179-TEH

Plaintiffs,

5

v.

6
7

REVISED ORDER ON FY 2015-2016
BUDGET

DELAINE EASTIN, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9

It has come to the Court’s attention that the Monitor’s budget was incorrectly

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

allocated in the Court’s recent Budget Order (Docket No. 2064). Consistent with the long-

12

standing principle that State Defendants should share a portion (20% this year) of the costs

13

for District-related expenses, the appropriate allocation of the Monitor’s budget should be

14

as follows:

15

19

Budget Items 

Office  
Consultants  
1
Parent Advocacy   
Monitor’s Salary  

20

Budget Totals 

16
17
18

CDE 
$86,767
$108,000
$74,000
$140,000

Allocation 
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
60.00%

Amount 
$52,060.20
$43,200
$14,800
$84,000

$408,767

47.47%

$194,060.20

District 
Allocation  
Amount 
40.00%
$34,706.80
60.00%
$64,800
80.00%
$59,200
40.00%
$56,000
52.53%

$214,706.80

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: 06/18/15

25

_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge

26
27
1

28

The budget item for “Parent Advocacy” remains unchanged as it was correctly allocated
at 20%/80% in the previous Order.