Emma C., et al v. Eastin, et al
Filing
2264
ORDER Setting Schedule for Budget Allocation Process for Fiscal Year 2017-2018. Proposed Budgets due by 4/21/2017. Joint Statement or email to Court Monitor due by 5/5/2017. Joint Statement or Opening Briefs due by 5/19/2017. Responses to Opening Briefs due by 6/2/2017. Budget Allocation Hearing (if needed) set for 6/19/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 3/21/17. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EMMA C., et al.,
7
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
DELAINE EASTIN, et al.,
10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR
BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017–2018
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 96-cv-04179-TEH
12
13
ALLOCATION PROCESS
A new fiscal year will commence on July 1, 2017. The Court hopes that Defendants will
14
15
be able to agree upon an equitable allocation for the RSIP implementation budget and the
16
Monitor’s Office budget for fiscal year 2017–2018 without intervention from the Court, in light of
17
the guidance provided by this Court’s May 14, 2003 Order Re: Initial Allocation (ECF No. 861),
18
and their past successes in reaching agreement. In the event that informal resolution is not
19
possible, however, the Court will make an equitable allocation.
To facilitate conducting the allocation process in a timely manner, the Court sets forth the
20
21
following schedule:
1. By no later than Friday, April 21, 2017, Ravenswood and the Court Monitor shall each
22
23
submit their respective proposed budgets to the Court and the parties.1
2. The Defendants shall, as soon as possible thereafter, meet and confer in good faith to seek
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Court recognizes that the future of RSIP implementation and monitoring is uncertain at this
time. For purposes of this Order, both Ravenswood and the Court Monitor should assume that the
RSIP will continue throughout the next school year, unless some agreement clarifying this is
reached by the parties prior to April 21, 2017 deadline. If circumstances change, the Court will
make any necessary adjustments to the respective budges and allocation in the future.
1
2
an agreement upon an equitable allocation for the fiscal year 2017–2018.
3. Defendants shall, by no later than Friday, May 5, 2017, file either a joint statement setting
3
forth an agreed upon allocation for fiscal year 2017–2018 or, if no agreement has been reached,
4
email the Court Monitor informing him they have not reached agreement and stating, without
5
argument, the areas of disagreement. The parties shall then participate in a mediation process led
6
by the Court Monitor in order to attempt to resolve these areas of disagreement.
7
4. Defendants shall, by no later than Friday, May 19, 2017, file either a joint statement
8
setting forth an agreed upon allocation for fiscal year 2017–2018, or, if no agreement has been
9
reached, separate opening briefs setting forth their respective positions with respect to an
10
appropriate allocation.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
5. If the parties have not reached agreement, Defendants shall respond to each other’s
12
opening briefs by no later than Friday, June 2, 2017. If Plaintiffs wish to address this matter,
13
they may file comments responding to Defendants’ opening briefs no later than Friday June 9,
14
2017. The Court shall hold a hearing on budget allocation, if necessary, on Monday, June 19,
15
2017, at 10:00 AM.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated: 3/21/17
19
_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?