Mitcham v. Calderon, et al

Filing 381

ORDER GRANTING 380 MOTION for Extension of Time to File SURREPLY. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/24/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:97-cv-03825-JSW Document380-2 1 2 3 Filed10/18/11 Page1 of 2 KAREN S. SCHRYVER, SB #124939 P.O. BOX 486 Gualala, CA 95445 Telephone: (707) 884-4502 Fax: (707) 884-4951 schryver@wildblue.net 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NEOMA D. KENWOOD, SB #101805 P.M.B. #414 1563 Solano Avenue Berkeley, California 94707 Telephone: (510) 528-4775 nkenwood@sbcglobal.net MICHAEL G. MILLMAN, SB #45639 CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROJECT 101 Second Street #600 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 495-0500 Fax: (415) 495-5616 MMillman@capsf.org Attorneys for Petitioner STEPHEN LOUIS MITCHAM 13 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 STEPHEN LOUIS MITCHAM, 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, 21 22 MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, 23 Respondent. Case No. C-97-3825 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER CAPITAL CASE 24 25 Having considered the unopposed motion of Petitioner to Modify the Filing Dates Re: 26 Surreply for Claim D and good cause appearing therefore, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER: PET’S UNOPPOSED MOT. TO MODIFY FILING DATES RE: SURREPLY Case No. C-97-03825-JSW -1- Case3:97-cv-03825-JSW Document380-2 1 Filed10/18/11 Page2 of 2 1. That Petitioner shall file a Surreply to Claim D (IAC subclaim) in his Amended 2 Petition, not later than 60 days from the entry of this Court’s Order on Petitioner’s Request to 3 Amend the Phase III Budget; 4 5 2. That Respondent shall file a Response not later than 30 days from the date of filing of Petitioner’s Surreply. 6 7 DATED: October 24, 2011 8 9 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER: PET’S UNOPPOSED MOT. TO MODIFY FILING DATES RE: SURREPLY Case No. C-97-03825-JSW -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?