USA v. Prescott

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUING GARNISHMENT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/28/14. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 MICHAEL COSENTINO, State Bar No. 83253 Attorney at Law P.O. Box 129 Alameda, CA 94501 Telephone: (510) 523-4702 Facsimile: (510) 747-1640 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 NO. C98-3891 M Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT , 16 STIPULATED ORDER OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT Defendant, 17 and 18 HOME DEPOT, INC.,, 19 Garnishee. / 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Judgment Creditor, United States of 22 America, and Judgment Debtor, CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT, that 23 the STIPULATED ORDER OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT entered February 16, 2012, at 24 docket # 18, be vacated. 25 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that garnishee, HOME DEPOT, INC., withhold 26 $125.00 each month from Judgment Debtor’s non-exempt disposable income, commencing 27 with the February 16, 2014, pay period, and continuing until the entire current judgment 28 principal, last compounded on February 24, 2014, in the amount of $5,328.32, (original STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER, US v. PRESCOTT , CAND # C98-03891 M 1 1 judgment in the amount of $4,783.90 entered January 5, 1999) plus interest compounded 2 annually pursuant to 28 USC §1961(a) & (b) at the rate of 4.513 % per annum on said current 3 judgment has been paid in full or until the garnishee no longer has custody, possession or 4 control of any property belonging to the debtor or until further Order of this court. 5 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that HOME DEPOT, INC., Garnishee, 6 immediately remit to the United States Department of Justice the above mentioned payments 7 as and for the month of March, 2014, and as and for each month thereafter. 8 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that said payments be made payable to the 9 U.S. Department of Justice, and be mailed to the Department of Justice-NCIF, P.O. Box 10 790363, St. Louis, MO 63179-0363, referencing the Judgment Debtor’s name and CDCS 11 Claim number 1998B11972 on each check for posting purposes. 12 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that in accordance with the provisions 13 of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) the parties hereby voluntarily waive their rights to proceed 14 before a judge of the United States District Court and consent to have a United States 15 magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case. It is understood that any 16 appeal from an order entered by a magistrate judge will be taken directly to the Ninth Circuit 17 of the United States Court of Appeals in the same manner as an appeal from any other 18 judgment of a District Court. 19 By his signature hereafter, CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT 20 acknowledges that he has read, understands and waives all of his rights under the CLERK’S 21 NOTICE OF POST-JUDGMENT GARNISHMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS TO DEFENDANT; 22 REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM; OBJECTION TO GARNISHEE’S ANSWER AND 23 REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM; NOTICE ON HOW TO CLAIM EXEMPTION; CLAIM FOR 24 EXEMPTION FORM and the WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT and the 25 APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT in exchange for the herein 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER, US v. PRESCOTT , CAND # C98-03891 M 2 1 2 payment stipulation. 3 Dated: February 26, 2014 _ /s/ Michael Cosentino, Counsel for United States Dated: February 26, 2014 _______/s/ CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. S Dated: 2/28/14 UNIT ED 9 RT U O 8 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T FO Spero LI ER A H 13 RT 12 NO 11 seph C. Judge Jo R NIA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER, US v. PRESCOTT , CAND # C98-03891 M 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?