USA v. Prescott
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUING GARNISHMENT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/28/14. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)
1
2
3
MICHAEL COSENTINO, State Bar No. 83253
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 129
Alameda, CA 94501
Telephone: (510) 523-4702
Facsimile: (510) 747-1640
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
United States of America
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
13
NO. C98-3891 M
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
CHARLES PRESCOTT aka
CHARLES E. PRESCOTT ,
16
STIPULATED ORDER OF
CONTINUING GARNISHMENT
Defendant,
17
and
18
HOME DEPOT, INC.,,
19
Garnishee.
/
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Judgment Creditor, United States of
22
America, and Judgment Debtor, CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT, that
23
the STIPULATED ORDER OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT entered February 16, 2012, at
24
docket # 18, be vacated.
25
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that garnishee, HOME DEPOT, INC., withhold
26
$125.00 each month from Judgment Debtor’s non-exempt disposable income, commencing
27
with the February 16, 2014, pay period, and continuing until the entire current judgment
28
principal, last compounded on February 24, 2014, in the amount of $5,328.32, (original
STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER, US v. PRESCOTT , CAND # C98-03891 M
1
1
judgment in the amount of $4,783.90 entered January 5, 1999) plus interest compounded
2
annually pursuant to 28 USC §1961(a) & (b) at the rate of 4.513 % per annum on said current
3
judgment has been paid in full or until the garnishee no longer has custody, possession or
4
control of any property belonging to the debtor or until further Order of this court.
5
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that HOME DEPOT, INC., Garnishee,
6
immediately remit to the United States Department of Justice the above mentioned payments
7
as and for the month of March, 2014, and as and for each month thereafter.
8
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that said payments be made payable to the
9
U.S. Department of Justice, and be mailed to the Department of Justice-NCIF, P.O. Box
10
790363, St. Louis, MO 63179-0363, referencing the Judgment Debtor’s name and CDCS
11
Claim number 1998B11972 on each check for posting purposes.
12
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED that in accordance with the provisions
13
of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) the parties hereby voluntarily waive their rights to proceed
14
before a judge of the United States District Court and consent to have a United States
15
magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case. It is understood that any
16
appeal from an order entered by a magistrate judge will be taken directly to the Ninth Circuit
17
of the United States Court of Appeals in the same manner as an appeal from any other
18
judgment of a District Court.
19
By his signature hereafter, CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT
20
acknowledges that he has read, understands and waives all of his rights under the CLERK’S
21
NOTICE OF POST-JUDGMENT GARNISHMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS TO DEFENDANT;
22
REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM; OBJECTION TO GARNISHEE’S ANSWER AND
23
REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM; NOTICE ON HOW TO CLAIM EXEMPTION; CLAIM FOR
24
EXEMPTION FORM and the WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT and the
25
APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT in exchange for the herein
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER, US v. PRESCOTT , CAND # C98-03891 M
2
1
2
payment stipulation.
3
Dated: February 26, 2014
_
/s/
Michael Cosentino, Counsel for United States
Dated: February 26, 2014
_______/s/
CHARLES PRESCOTT aka CHARLES E. PRESCOTT
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
Dated: 2/28/14
UNIT
ED
9
RT
U
O
8
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
FO
Spero
LI
ER
A
H
13
RT
12
NO
11
seph C.
Judge Jo
R NIA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED GARNISHMENT ORDER, US v. PRESCOTT , CAND # C98-03891 M
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?