Johnson v. Ayers

Filing 553

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION granting 550 Motion. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/29/2022)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

WILLIE DARNELL JOHNSON,
Petitioner,

6
7
8
9

Case No. 98-cv-04043-SI
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 550

RON BROOMFIELD,
Respondent.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Petitioner has filed a motion requesting clarification of the status of claims contained in his
habeas petitioner. A review of the record reveals the following:
1) Claims B, C, D and a portion of claim Q involving allegations that jurors consumed

14

alcohol during deliberations were denied an evidentiary hearing. ECF Dkt. No. 119.

15

The Court did not, however, address the merits of these claims.

16

2) Portions of claims J, P, R, T, U, V and W have been stricken. ECF Dkt. No. 287.

17

3) Claims A, H, I, P and a portion of claim Q alleging that jurors were exposed to extra-

18

record statements during deliberations have been denied on the merits. ECF Dkt. Nos.

19

379, 538 & 549.

20

It appears that the remaining claims of the petition have not been adjudicated. The Court

21

directs the parties to submit a joint statement outlining a proposed litigation schedule for the

22

remainder of petitioner’s claims by May 31, 2022.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2022
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge