Castro v. Terhune, et al
Filing
494
ORDER RE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ON ATTORNEY'S FEES by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 493 Stipulation.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
CARLOS CASTRO,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE STAY OF
PROCEEDINGS ON
ATTORNEY’S FEES
CAL TERHUNE, et al,
Defendants.
/
14
15
No. C 98-04877 WHA
The parties have indicated they have an agreement in-principle on plaintiff’s motion for
16
attorney’s fees and costs and have requested a stay until March 30, 2012, of the proceedings
17
regarding plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and cost, including the time period in which to
18
respond to the special master’s report. The deadline for responding to the special master’s report
19
was March 7. Defendants’ filed their objections on March 7. No objection has been filed by
20
plaintiff. Should plaintiff desire to file an objection, plaintiff will need to seek leave of Court, as
21
the deadline for filing objections has passed and will not be stayed.
22
The parties will have until NOON ON MARCH 29, 2012, to reach an agreement on the
23
attorney’s fees and costs issue and file a dismissal. If no such dismissal is filed, an order will
24
issue resolving the motion.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: March 8, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?