Bowoto et al v. Chevron Corporation et al

Filing 1856

ORDER RE: LETTER REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING RE VISA REQUESTS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CHEVRON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. / LARRY BOWOTO, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 99-02506 SI ORDER RE: LETTER REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING RE VISA REQUESTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA By letter brief, plaintiffs have requested another hearing on their visa problems, seeking the following relief: permission to take trial preservation depositions; permission to present video conference trial testimony; an order directing CNL to invite plaintiffs' counsel to come to Nigeria for trial preparation; and an order continuing from 9/15/08 to 10/13/08 the date for designating deposition testimony. Chevron opposes all of these requests. The request for a further hearing is DENIED. The request for an order permitting plaintiffs to take trial preservation depositions for any plaintiff or witness for whom they are now unable to obtain a visa is DENIED. Discovery has closed long since, and these witnesses were, for the most part, already deposed. It was plaintiffs' choice not to take trial preservation testimony during the discovery process; at this late date it would be unfair to reopen discovery for this purpose. Plaintiffs' request for an order permitting plaintiffs to present the trial testimony of Nigerian plaintiffs and witnesses through video-conferencing technology is conditionally GRANTED. Plaintiffs may take steps to make the appropriate arrangements. If those arrangements are adequate to allow clearly audible direct- and cross-examination of the witnesses, under oath and with adequate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 interpretation facilities, the Court will allow plaintiffs to proceed in that manner. The Court can provide one videoconferencing facility in the courtroom, but plaintiffs will be responsible for making and paying for all arrangements on the far end. Plaintiffs' request for an order directing defendants to direct CNL to write a letter inviting plaintiffs' counsel to come to Nigeria for trial preparation, including videoconferencing arrangements, is DENIED without prejudice to reconsideration should plaintiffs' counsel be denied entry to Nigeria for trial preparation. Plaintiffs' request for an order continuing the date to designate depositions for witnesses unable to secure a visa is GRANTED IN PART: the September 15, 2008 deadline is extended to September 29, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 2, 2008 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?