Bowoto et al v. Chevron Corporation et al

Filing 2284

ORDER continuing motions to 3/6/09. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/23/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009)

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI

Document 2283

Filed 01/21/2009

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (#060359) [e-mail] Caroline N. Mitchell (#143124) [e-mail] JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Theresa M. Traber (#116305) [e-mail] TRABER & VOORHEES 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 Pasadena, California 91103 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. C-99-2506-SI

LARRY BOWOTO, et. al. Plaintiffs,

PARTIES STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION, et 59(a) AND RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW al., Defendants. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have noticed their Motion for New Trial Under Rule 59(a) and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law for hearing in this Court on February 6, 2009; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their moving papers on December 16, 2008 and Defendants filed their opposition brief on January 16, 2008; WHEREAS, absent an extension, Plaintiffs' reply brief is due on January 23, 2009; 1
PARTI ES' STIPU LATION REGA RDING B RIEFING SCHEDU LE FOR PLAINTI FFS' MOTION FO R NEW TRIAL AND RENEWED J MOL C-99-2506-SI

Case 3:99-cv-02506-SI

Document 2283

Filed 01/21/2009

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs maintain that given the complicated nature of the issues in this case and the volume of materials cited in Defendants' opposition brief, Plaintiffs require more time to work on their reply brief; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested, and defendants agreed to, an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file their reply brief from January 23, 2009 to February 6, 2009 (two weeks); WHEREAS, a February 6, 2009 due date for the reply brief would ordinarily correspond to a February 20, hearing date, and the parties all desire that this matter to be set for hearing on February 20 or as soon thereafter as possible; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 1. The deadline for filing Plaintiffs' Reply will be February 6, 2009. 2. The hearing shall be scheduled for _Mar________________, 2009. ___ ch 6,

DATED: January 21, 2009

JONES DAY By: _________//s//______ Lara Kollios Attorneys for Defendants

DATED: January 21, 2009

HADSELL STORMER KEENY RICHARSON & RENICK By: //s// Lauren Teukolsky Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January ___, 2009 By: The Hon. Susan Illston United States District Court Judge

2

PARTI ES' STIPU LATION REGA RDING B RIEFING SCHEDU LE FOR PLAINTI FFS' MOTION IN LIMI NE TO EXCLUDE MOD EL C-99-2506-SI