Universal Trading & Investment Co v. Kiritchenko et al
Filing
1899
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF ORDER PERMITTING RECOVERY OF ATTACHMENT BONDS; VACATING DECEMBER 3, 2010 HEARING. Denying 1888 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
<![CDATA[
Universal Trading & Investment Co v. Kiritchenko et al
Doc. 1899
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff Universal Trading & Investment Company's ("UTI") Motion for Stay of Execution of Order Permitting Recovery of Attachment Bonds ("Motion for Stay"), filed October 19, 2010, by which UTI requests this Court stay, for an unspecified period of time, its Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Order Permitting Recovery on Attachment Bonds ("Bond Order"), issued October 13, 2010. Defendants Peter Kiritchenko, Ludmilla Kiritchenko, Brancross U.S. Holdings, Inc., BRC Property Holdings, LLC, and Xanadu Property Holdings, LLC have filed opposition, to which UTI has filed a reply. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the parties' respective submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for December 3, 2010, and rules as follows. UTI does not identify the authority pursuant to which it requests a stay of the Bond United States District Court UNIVERSAL TRADING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation Plaintiff, v. PETRO MIKOLAYEVICH KIRITCHENKO, an individual, et al., Defendants. / No. C-99-3073 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF ORDER PERMITTING RECOVERY OF ATTACHMENT BONDS; VACATING DECEMBER 3, 2010 HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Order, and none is apparent. Moreover, the Court previously has considered and found unpersuasive the arguments UTI again raises in the instant motion. (See Orders filed Oct. 13, Nov. 1, & Nov. 17, 2010.) Accordingly, UTI's Motion for Stay is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 22, 2010
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
