Universal Trading & Investment Co v. Kiritchenko et al

Filing 1916

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR LEAVE TO CONSIDER LATE MEMORANDUM; DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING INSPECTION OF PURPORTED CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTS. Finding as moot 1911 Motion for Leave to File; finding as moot 1913 Motion for Disclosure. Signed by J. Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

UNIVERSAL TRADING & INVESTMENT
COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14

No. C-99-3073 MMC

Plaintiff,
v.
PETRO MIKOLAYEVICH KIRITCHENKO,
an individual, et al.,
Defendants.

/

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR LEAVE
TO CONSIDER LATE MEMORANDUM;
DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING
INSPECTION OF PURPORTED
CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTS

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

In light of third-party American Contractors Indemnity Company’s withdrawal, filed
August 11, 2011, of its Motion for Entry of Judgment Against Bond Principal, the Court
hereby DENIES as moot plaintiff Universal Trading & Investment Company’s (1) “Request
for Administrative Relief for Leave to Consider Late Memorandum in Opposition to Motion
by American Contractors Indemnity Company Against Bond Principal,” filed July 20, 2011,
and (2) “Motion for an Order Allowing Inspection of Purported Contractual Documents
Between American Indemnity Company and Plaintiff,” filed July 21, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 12, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge