USA v. Guarducci

Filing 15

WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued to County of Alameda. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Separate Instructions)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 MICHAEL COSENTINO State Bar No. 83253 Counsel for the United States P.O. Box 129 Alameda, CA 94501 3 4 5 Telephone: (510) 523-4702 Facsimile: (510) 747-1640 Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. C99-3153 JCS 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. SANDY M. GUARDUCCI aka SANDY M. FRANCO, 16 Defendant, 17 and 18 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE 19 ______________________Garnishee._/ 20 21 SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE 22 TO: COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 23 ENCLOSED IS A WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT REQUESTING 24 THAT YOU DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAVE IN YOUR POSSESSION, 25 CUSTODY OR CONTROL ANY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE DEBTOR LISTED 26 THEREIN, OR ANY OTHER PROPERTY OF THE DEBTOR. YOU ARE REQUIRED 27 BY LAW TO SERVE A WRITTEN ANSWER TO THIS WRIT. YOU ARE FURTHER 28 REQUIRED TO WITHHOLD AND RETAIN ANY PROPERTY IN WHICH THE 1 DEBTOR HAS A SUBSTANTIAL NON-EXEMPT INTEREST. A LIST OF 2 EXEMPTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT IS 3 ATTACHED TO THE CLERK’S NOTICE ENCLOSED WITH THIS PAPER. 4 IF YOU FAIL TO ANSWER THIS WRIT OR TO WITHHOLD PROPERTY IN 5 ACCORDANCE WITH THE WRIT, THE COURT MAY MAKE YOU LIABLE FOR 6 THAT AMOUNT OF THE DEBTOR’S NON-EXEMPT PROPERTY WHICH YOU FAIL 7 TO WITHHOLD. ADDITIONALLY, YOU MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR A 8 REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IF THE 9 UNITED STATES FILES A PETITION TO THE COURT REQUESTING AN 10 EXPLANATION FOR YOUR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS WRIT. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEPARATE INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEE C99-3153 JCS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?