Eslaminia, et al v. FBI, et al

Filing 89

ORDER RE FURTHER SUBMISSIONS: In view of the court's understanding of the declassification provisions of Executive Order 13526, the court requests that defendants advise the court of their intentions with respect to declassification; whether the y intend to invoke any of the subparagraphs and, if so, identify them and set forth the bases upon which they would seek such invocation. Also, if the court misperceives the effect of the Executive Order, defendants shall explain their interpretatio n. Defendants shall file this requested submission on or before September 15, 2011. Plaintiffs may respond on or before September 30, 2011. No further submissions shall be made; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/25/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 No. C 99-3249 MHP 8 REZA ESLAMINIA, et al., United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 ORDER RE FURTHER SUMISSIONS Plaintiff(s), 9 vs. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Defendant(s). / 13 14 This Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq., matter has been pending 15 for a substantial period of time as the parties know, and through no fault of theirs. According to the 16 record in this case the documents sought pursuant to FOIA were classified in August 1986. See, 17 e.g., Jt. State. Undisp. Facts ¶14. The exact date in August 1986 is not clear from the papers before 18 the court. However, the August 1986 date appears to have some significance for this proceeding. 19 On December 29, 2009, the President of the United States signed Executive Order 13526, 75 20 Fed. Reg. 707 (Dec. 29, 2009)(replacing Executive Orders 13292 and 12958), effective June 27, 21 2010. In accordance with section 3.3(a) of the Order classified records that are more than 25 years 22 old are to be automatically declassified. Specifically, it would appear under this section, the 23 declassification shall occur at least by “December 31 of the year that is 25 years from the date of 24 origin” unless action is taken under paragraphs (b)-(d) and (g)-(j) or the terms of those paragraphs 25 are otherwise triggered. Thus, it would appear that at least by December 31, 2011 the records 26 sought in this action will be automatically declassified in the absence of an exception under any of 27 these subparagraphs. 28 1 In view of the court’s understanding of the declassification provisions of Executive Order 2 13526, the court requests that defendants advise the court of their intentions with respect to 3 declassification; whether they intend to invoke any of the subparagraphs and, if so, identify them 4 and set forth the bases upon which they would seek such invocation. Also, if the court misperceives 5 the effect of the Executive Order, defendants shall explain their interpretation. Defendants shall file 6 this requested submission on or before September 15, 2011. Plaintiffs may respond on or before 7 September 30, 2011. No further submissions shall be made. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Date: August 25, 2011 MARILYN HALL PATEL United States District Court Judge Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?