Dossman v. Newland
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/19/2009: # 1 pos) (ys, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEPHEN DOSSMAN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY NEWLAND, warden, Respondent. /
No. C 00-384 SI (pr) ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
Petitioner filed a notice of appeal, which the court construes as also requesting a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED because petitioner has not demonstrated that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The clerk shall forward to the court of appeals the case file with this order. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 15, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?