Asian Communications, et al v. Zi Corporation, et al

Filing 427

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR BRIEFING. Defendants' opposition shall be due October 17, 2008. Tegic's reply shall be due October 24, 2008. The hearing on plaintiffs' motions is continued to November 7, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 10, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is the parties' "Stipulated Request Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 for Order Changing Time for Briefing," filed October 9, 2008, by which the parties seek to extend the briefing schedule on plaintiff Tegic Communications, Inc.'s ("Tegic") Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Motion for Leave to File said Contempt Motion. Because plaintiffs conditioned said stipulation on retention of the current hearing date, and because the Court declines to maintain such date if the briefing schedule is extended, the Court construes the stipulation as a unilateral request by defendants to extend the date by which their opposition is due. So construed, the request is hereby GRANTED, as follows: 1. Defendants' opposition shall be due October 17, 2008, 2. Tegic's reply shall be due October 24, 2008, 3. The hearing on plaintiffs' motions is hereby CONTINUED to November 7, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2008 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge v. ZI CORP., et al., Defendants. / United States District Court ASIAN COMMC'NS PTY LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-00-0989 MMC ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR BRIEFING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?