Asian Communications, et al v. Zi Corporation, et al

Filing 428

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONSENT JUDGMENT. The motion is granted. Plaintiff Tegic Communications, Inc. shall file in the public record, no later than October 22, 2008, an redacted version of the Declaration of Doug Colt in Support of Contempt Motion. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 15, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 2 [e-mail] m 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) kevinjo [e-mail] m Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) [e-mail] m Doug Colt (Bar No. 210915) [e-mail] m Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672) [e-mail] 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065-213 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff, TEGIC 12 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 00-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONSENT JUDGMENT Date: September 26, 2008 Time: 9:00 a.m. Crtrm.: 7, 19th Floor Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

17 ASIAN COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD., an Australian corporation, and TEGIC 18 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Washington corporation, 19 Plaint iffs, 20 vs. 21 ZI CORPORATION, a Canadian corporation, 22 and ZI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28

Case No. 00-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff Tegic Communications, Inc.'s ("Tegic") Administrative On September 26, 2008, the Administrative Motion ("Motion") to Seal Documents Motion to Seal Documents Submitted in Support of Motion for Order to Show Cause Why 2 Submitted in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Defendants Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Consent Judgment, filed August 18, 2008. 3 Not Be Held in Contempt of the Consent Judgment by Plaintiff Tegic Communications, Inc. No opposition has been filed. 4 ("Contempt Motion") came on for hearing. All appearances were stated on the record. The Court 1 5 having considered the pleadings and papers submitted in support of the motion, the opposition Tegic's 6 thereto, and the arguments of counsel, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff's Motion is 7 hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the following information constitutes sealable material 8 under L.R. 79-5: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case No. 00-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER

1. 2.

Exhibit s B, I, and J to Declaration of Robert D. Young in Support of Contempt Motion. Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Doug Colt in Support of Contempt Motion.

3. Paragraph 4 of Declaration of Doug Colt in Support of Contempt Motion. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk to file under seal the material described in items one and two and an unredacted version of the Declaration of Doug Colt in Support of Contempt Motion. Tegic shall file in the public record, no later than October 22, 2008, a redacted version The Court hereby directs the Clerk to FILE UNDER SEAL the foregoing materials. of said declaration omitting the material described in item three. IT IS SO ORDERED

October 15 Dated: ____________________, 2008

_______________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge