Asian Communications, et al v. Zi Corporation, et al

Filing 463

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 31, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 2 [e-mail] m 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) kevinjo [e-mail] m Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) [e-mail] m Doug Colt (Bar No. 210915) [e-mail] m Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672) [e-mail] 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065-213 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff, TEGIC 12 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 00-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEFS RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ZI DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONSENT JUDGMENT MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONSENT JUDGMENT Date: November 7, 2008 Time: 9:00 a.m. Crtrm.: 7, 19th Floor Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
Case No. 00-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER

ASIAN COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD., an 17 Australian corporation, and TEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Washington 18 corporation, 19 20 vs. Plaint iffs,

21 ZI CORPORATION, a Canadian corporation, and ZI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, 22 INC., a Nevada corporation, 23 24 25 26 27 28
51427/2677645.1

Defendants.

1

The Court having reviewed plaintiff Tegic Communications, Inc.'s On November 7, 2008, the Administrative Motion ("Motion") to Seal Documents

2 Submitted in Support of Plaintiff's Reply Briefs Re: Motion for Leave to File Motion for Order to 3 Show Cause Why Zi Defendants Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Consent Judgment ("Leave 4 to File Reply Motion") and Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not be the Declaration of Doug 5 Held in Contempt of Consent Judgment ("Contempt Reply Motion"), came on for hearing. All Colt filed in support of the motion to seal, and the Declaration of Eric B. Evans pursuant to 6 appearances were stated on the record. The Court having considered the pleadings and papers Civil Local Rule 69-5(d), 7 submitted in support of the motion, the opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel, and 8 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the 9 following information constitutes sealable material under L.R. 79-5: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
51427/2677645.1

1.

Designated portions of the Leave to File Reply Motion: i:10-15, 17, 19; 1:13-18, 20-24; 2:12-13; 3:16, 22-25; 4:12, 20, 22, 27-28; 5:1-2, 4-16, 18-23, 26-28; 6:1-8, 14, 20, 22-23; 7:5-19, 23, 25-26; 8:5, 7-14, 16, 18, 20-21, 26-27; 10:15, 21-25, 2728; 11:1-2, 8-9, 11, 17-18; 12:1-4, 10-11, 23-24; and 13:9-10, 21. Designated portions of the Contempt Reply Motion: i:16-20; 5:4-5, 12-17, 19, 2124; 6:1-11, 14-20, 25-28; 9:7-8; 10:6, 9-15, 17-20, 26-27; 11:1-2, 6, 8-12, 14-15, 17-18, 20-28; and 12:1-3, 6-11, 15-17, 19-20. Designated portions of the Supplemental Declarat ion of Robert Young in support of the Contempt Reply Motion: 1:11-12, 1:17-18, 2:1-11, and 2:13-21. Designated portions of Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Supplemental Declaration of Doug Colt in support of the Contempt Reply Motion: third paragraph of Exhibit 1, including the block quote and all sentences except for the second to last, and the second paragraph of Exhibit 2, including all sentences except for the second.

2.

3. 4.

The Court hereby directs the Clerk to FILE UNDER SEAL the foregoing materials. unredacted versions of the foregoing documents. Plaintiff shall file in the public record redacted versions of said documents. IT IS SO ORDERED

October 31 Dated: ____________________, 2008

_______________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

-2-

Case No. 00-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER