Asian Communications, et al v. Zi Corporation, et al

Filing 489

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO TAI AND DAWSON DECLARATIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 7, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAYER BROWN LLP BRANDON D. BAUM (SBN 121318) baum@mayerbrown.com ERIC B. EVANS (SBN 232476) eevans@mayerbrown.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331 2060 SHARON A. ISRAEL (pro hac vice) sisrael@mayerbrown.com 700 Louisiana St. Suite 3400 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: (713) 238-3000 Facsimile: (713) 238-4888 Attorneys for Defendants ZI CORPORATION, a Canadian corporation, and ZI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ASIAN COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD., an Australian corporation, and TEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ZI CORPORATION, a Canadian corporation, and ZI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendants. DATE: November 7, 2008 TIME: 9:00 A.M. COURT: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor Hon. Maxine M. Chesney CASE NO. 00-CV-0989 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO TAI AND DAWSON DECLARATIONS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL CASE NO. 00-CV-0989 MMC 24664673 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court having reviewed Defendants Zi Corporation and Zi Corporation of America, Inc.'s (collectively, "Zi") Administrative Request to Seal Response to Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to Declarations of George Tai and Lisa Dawson in Support of Defendants' Reply in Support of Cross-Motion to Compel Arbitration ("Evidentiary Response") and the supporting Declaration of Eric B. Evans, Zi's Administrative Request to Seal is GRANTED. Further, Zi has shown that good cause exists to seal the Evidentiary Response. Therefore, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that: (1) The unredacted version of Zi's Evidentiary Response which includes portions that consist of and discuss the parties' settlement agreement, Exhibit C to the Declaration of Doug Colt in support of Tegic's Motion for Leave in this matter, be filed under seal. and (2) Zi be granted leave to file a redacted and unsealed version of its Evidentiary Response, redacting references to the parties' settlement agreement. As set forth in the Evans Declaration, the aforementioned materials are "sealable" material under FED. R. CIV. P. 26(c) and Civil L.R. 79-5. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 7, 2008 ______________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney U.S. District Court Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO SEAL CASE NO. 00-CV-0989 MMC 24664673

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?